Viewing profile — wtallis
wtallis
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Sep 20, 2009, 10:02 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 21,880
- Public activity
- 7,141 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About wtallis
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49218458
None of what you said actually explains how HBM could require 3x the wafers. The base interface die has eight or 12 memory dies stacked on top of it. The wafer cost of that interfa…
-
comment
Comment #49211620
> (each HBM3 die is >1000mm² of silicon) Did you mean that each HBM3 stack is that large? Because it only takes one glance to see that the memory chips are much smaller than reticl…
-
comment
Comment #49193701
> who knows? You could try reading the footnotes, which include a link to https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/solutions/a...
-
comment
Comment #49193670
In a hypothetical world where AMD wasn't allowed to do AMD64, and Intel stayed committed to Itanium: Itanium would still have sucked, and both PowerPC and SPARC would have out-sold…
-
comment
Comment #49115982
I've seen enough complaints about features like automatic emergency braking to be quite scared—not of the tech features, but of the drivers who are so overconfident that they are u…
-
comment
Comment #49099017
Reads don't wear out flash memory to any meaningful extent.
-
comment
Comment #49071102
OEM versions of Windows are just copies with license terms dictating that they are to be installed on and tied to a specific new PC, as opposed to a full retail license that is not…
-
comment
Comment #49049868
AMD's Strix Halo has a 256-bit memory bus. Apple's Max class chips have a 512-bit memory bus, Ultra class chips have a 1024-bit memory bus. Unless you want to go for datacenter har…
-
comment
Comment #49042537
LLM inference is a two-phase process. The first phase is prompt processing aka prefill. It's compute-heavy but requires relatively low memory bandwidth. The second phase is token g…
-
comment
Comment #49040208
> A very frequent real-world workload is the compilation of a software project, which scales almost perfectly with the number of cores. Geekbench has that as a subtest. > For the o…
-
comment
Comment #49038225
> While it would be nice to have a multi-threaded benchmark that demonstrates a realistic scaling towards many threads, I have no reason whatsoever to trust that the Geekbench impl…
-
comment
Comment #49038115
I don't think you've put forth a coherent argument here. SPEC CPU is distributed in source form, to be compiled by the end user. There are restrictions on what kind of compiler opt…
-
comment
Comment #49036292
Geekbench is not just intended to be used to benchmark consumer systems, it is intended to be used by consumers to benchmark their systems and to have its scores interpreted by con…
-
comment
Comment #49027370
Yes, they have a valid reason for the change. But I think it's still making a tradeoff, and has a clearly identifiable downside because the content of the multi-core test suite is …
-
comment
Comment #49027161
> But, of all of the 2-pick-only options, choosing a custom mix and calling it multi-core requires guessing your actual workload on both the content of the mixed test suite as well…
-
comment
Comment #49027104
Geekbench is not intended for benchmarking large workstations. Look at how the web site actually describes the benchmark. It's for phones and laptops and similar devices. A test mo…
-
comment
Comment #49026252
Please stop framing the multi core scaling issue as a matter of the benchmark being good or bad. Geekbench 5 scores scale better than Geekbench 6 scores because Geekbench 5's multi…
-
comment
Comment #48981944
The client/consumer desktop market hasn't actually disappeared, and soldered memory is almost unheard-of in that market segment.
-
comment
Comment #48979773
The iGPU's video decoder could even be drastically less efficient than the dGPU's decoder, and it would still be better to use the iGPU, because just powering up the PCIe link and …
-
comment
Comment #48955538
You might want to not only re-evaluate what you consider a real GPU, but also take a look at what the latest Intel integrated graphics is capable of (Panther Lake laptop chips with…
-
comment
Comment #48915309
I was including USB history before USB-C, because HDMI and DisplayPort have been around much longer than USB-C. And limiting the discussion to "fully-featured USB-C cables" is igno…
-
comment
Comment #48914925
The critical difference is that USB versions keep adding new wires and active components, while the display cables largely stick to tightening the analog signal integrity requireme…
-
comment
Comment #48898114
> I guess I just don't really buy your argument, because if their CPUs had turned out poorly, you could have applied the same argument to their CPUs instead of the GPUs. Doesn't th…
-
comment
Comment #48895416
You say "that's exactly why they do it" then go on to describe something entirely different: an organization with plenty of options to spend their development resources on, and the…
-
comment
Comment #48887018
> Yes, get-childitem is a little weird to remember, That's not the problem. The problem is that it's way too much typing , and with the default tab completion behavior it's often w…