Viewing profile — worried4future
worried4future
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Nov 24, 2021, 1:31 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 125
- Public activity
- 42 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About worried4future
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48753718
I'm fine with that if we can remove the technical error rate and barriers to actually executing these people. If you're caught in a situation like this you should not be in jail on…
-
comment
Comment #48753692
I do not seek perfection. We have a justice system which makes those determinations, its not about perfection, it never has been.
-
comment
Comment #48753663
Its not about vengeance or a desire for closure, I simply do not want these people to continue to exist. They offer no benefit to my society, they contribute nothing beneficial and…
-
comment
Comment #48750300
Can you have compassion, love even, for someone who has been the victim of horrific acts? Honest question, what are your limits of compassion? Do you have compassion, love, or have…
-
comment
Comment #48750286
> So you're ok with the state killing criminals? Yes. > What if they get the wrong person? Don't kill those.
-
comment
Comment #40243473
> assuming he must be guilty of something awful He is. He is guilty of doing something his employer didn't like and they fired him for it.
-
comment
Comment #40232266
Nonsense. If you read the original article it specifically says he sought out the protestors. > he went to the lounge on the 10th floor of Google’s New York City office around lunc…
-
comment
Comment #40232258
His commentary isn't the exonerating statement you seem to think it is. By his own admission he sought to join the protestors (he went to the lounge on the 10th floor of Google’s N…
-
comment
Comment #40232243
And, as I pointed out in my original comment, google has massive information asymmetry here. They have video and email and message history and badge access times and maybe audio re…
-
comment
Comment #40227055
I also don't think this counts as a strike, at least the actions taken do not fully fall within the protections of a strike even if they were striking for a reason for which strike…
-
comment
Comment #40226962
> Google apparently fired some 20+ employees who either weren't involved the protest at all, or whose alleged participation remains unclear Maybe that's true, maybe it's not, but t…
-
comment
Comment #40218013
The meat of it is here: > Google “retaliated against approximately 50 employees and interfered with their Section 7 rights by terminating and/or placing them on administrative leav…
-
comment
Comment #40139895
Apologies for calling it by it's historical name instead of the revisionist one the British gave it.
-
comment
Comment #40138671
I'm not saying they aren't capable of committing war crimes or genocide or whatever other terms you want to use. Clearly Israel is eminently capable of simply flattening Gaza (and …
-
comment
Comment #40138639
Because genocide definitionally requires intent. > Genocide is the intentional destruction of a people in whole or in part.. Wikipedia
-
comment
Comment #40138628
For missiles? The government already decides that for you. You can only (and only somewhat) decide to not sell things the government says you can to people the government says you …
-
comment
Comment #40136876
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #39912176
Oh no. Jeff will have to make his next yacht 1 foot shorter. Seriously, I have a hard time caring about this.
-
comment
Comment #34812014
where in the 5000 word article does it talk about compelled speech, I skimmed it and searched and I don't see anything.
-
comment
Comment #34811998
This is barring them from saying specific things, not compelling them to say other things, do you have an example of any compelled speech?
-
comment
Comment #33553734
he should be made to pay 1 billion million trillion dollars. his ability to pay my made up number is about on par with his ability to pay the courts made up number, at this point i…
-
comment
Comment #33100664
> Just because a project or budget is black doesn't necessarily mean it's useless or nefarious. Of course not, it does mean that we don't have the ability to know if it is useless …
-
comment
Comment #33100476
I'm not trying to debate the rightness or wrongness of Alex Berenson, I'm simply pointing to this as an example of the federal government strong-arming corporations into censoring …
-
comment
Comment #33096786
If you seriously think that people in the federal government don't try to control the media narrative, you're ignoring a huge body of history where they have done exactly that. Mos…
-
comment
Comment #32879850
No, because, when you're paying for an education you can also get loans (at usurious rates) to cover cost of living expenses too! You won't pay now for that 10k/year required meal …