Viewing profile — unboxed_type
unboxed_type
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Aug 19, 2015, 10:37 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 84
- Public activity
- 87 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About unboxed_type
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #20916036
What is a "promotion committee"? By saying promotion, are you talking about transitioning from "engineer level 1" to "engineer level 2" kind of thing? I wonder if your advice can b…
-
comment
Comment #18997470
Are you talking about CertiCoq project? It is not ready yet and not clear when will be. [1] https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~appel/certicoq/
- story
-
comment
Comment #18960553
Listen to this wise man, he knows what is speaking about.
-
comment
Comment #17180002
True. It is worth pointing out that Isabelle/HOL does not have dependent types in its underlying logic making framework building a (much?) harder work.
-
comment
Comment #17082641
Despite being based on semi-functional programming language Scala, I found no evidence that the language AxLang has anything to do with formal verification. I may be wrong, but wha…
-
comment
Comment #16949007
GitHub feels so much like some social network site. It has too many distraction factors for any thinking person, that's why I hate it. Bitbucket is a real thing. Go get it, stop be…
-
comment
Comment #16324613
Whats the business model behind that kind of activity?
-
comment
Comment #16265072
Authentication of a write operation is not the only problem a blockchain system solves. Using a public blockchain, for example, you are assured that: 0) all writes are authenticate…
-
comment
Comment #16264993
Interesting point, thanks for sharing. But, anyway: What incentives do those mirroring nodes have to store regular data blobs and process requests from clients? Who will decide the…
-
comment
Comment #16258178
Thanks for that quote!
-
comment
Comment #16258169
>But of course, if this is the case, then it begs the >question of why a blockchain is even needed. Just use a >shared database. Two issues regarding your second observation. 1) A …
-
comment
Comment #16256707
I wonder how one may prove that a thing originates from some specific place? I mean, you have to have some kind of trusted by all parties external observer who will assure that fac…
-
comment
Comment #16213172
If a supplier is running its own blockchain, then it really makes little sense. But to gain real trust of its clients, supplier will actually put it on a public blockchain. Only th…
-
comment
Comment #16204768
Why not to use already running platforms like Ethereum where all those incentive issues are already solved?
-
comment
Comment #16204712
By using such BC solution, you can be sure that you eat a fish caught by some certified supplier and not by some poachers. A certifying body is assumed to check ethical questions.
-
comment
Comment #15720602
Most probably because of a lack of functional programming mindset.
-
comment
Comment #15720560
When you have a need to establish some business procedure between different parties that do not trust each other, smart contracts might be very useful. No other database is able to…
-
comment
Comment #15628437
It is a bit out of topic, but anyway: Is it possible to defend a PhD thesis without taking a graduate program at all? Imagine an industry researcher without a PhD degree who is wil…
-
comment
Comment #15599684
Oh, sorry for that, the question was misunderstood. I presume that a user-level contract language like Simplicity is going to be translated into low-level byte code like EVM. That …
-
comment
Comment #15599646
I can program a contract that can be parameterized with an address of some other sub-contract (then, say, store it in variable), which I call to do some particular logic. If I chan…
-
comment
Comment #15592812
> it's arguably better to work from a framework which guarantees that it won't be by construction... rather than attempting a game-of-operation where minor modifications to your pr…
-
comment
Comment #15592707
>In fact I don't even understand why a blockchain language must emphasize provability. For two reasons: 1) A smart contract can not be changed in a BC after deployment, so it has t…
-
comment
Comment #15592549
It is far from solid and yet it is easy to understand (modulo corner cases) . I doubt that lambda-calculus-like language will take over it just because it gives one an ability to p…
-
comment
Comment #15592515
I have nothing to say about the language (I gave up reading those cumbersome slides), but I am really amazed that you expect someone to like that presentation! :)