Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — uejfiweun

uejfiweun

HN member
Joined
Sat, Aug 07, 2021, 8:15 PM UTC
HN karma
1,877
Public activity
1,059 items

About uejfiweun

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49223245

    Yeah, this most certainly isn't happening.

  2. comment
    Comment #49197566

    Bizarre! Love it :)

  3. comment
    Comment #49192681

    I think Google realized that it's more profitable to sell compute to AI labs than to make AI. They are not an ideologically driven company like Anthropic. They very much turned int…

  4. comment
    Comment #49111421

    It's funny how Google is essentially trying to compete with the software side of Tesla only - Waymos (which AFAIK they plan to partner with major automakers), now this, etc.

  5. comment
    Comment #49042561

    Is it really so hard to understand that open models are behind and yet they are also continually improving and way better than they were a year ago? Like I'm not sure what your poi…

  6. comment
    Comment #49008725

    This is such a smooth-brain reply, dude. The capability literally exists, today. You're telling me that it's just SO fantastical that people will be able to catch up? Give me a bre…

  7. comment
    Comment #49002237

    All you've said needs the qualifier - "for now!" Look at the trend line. It's clear that if they're not yet at the level of being "good enough" for coding, they will be soon. Sensa…

  8. comment
    Comment #48993830

    I know that Flash is obviously no Opus or Fable. That being said, when I want a very quick response, my go-to is Gemini Flash. It's just really damn fast and generally tends to be …

  9. comment
    Comment #48958979

    This was notably one of the "training programs" that Neo went through in The Matrix, along with a variety of other martial art styles.

  10. comment
    Comment #48943619

    Fable is very bad at wasting tokens when it comes to doing these renderings and diffs - I had the exact same experience as you.

  11. comment
    Comment #48856833

    What makes you think the supply crunch is short-term?

  12. comment
    Comment #48809581

    The reason is because AI is viewed by the powers that be as inexorably linked to national security. If you haven't noticed, every lab out there has the same excuse when pressed abo…

  13. comment
    Comment #48808398

    Of course not. This coming crash will be where we learn that tech is "too big to fail" in the same way that the financial system is. They'll let one player fail (likely Anthropic, …

  14. comment
    Comment #48788658

    What are you talking about? We're literally in the middle of one of the most transformative technological revolutions we've ever had.

  15. comment
    Comment #48768800

    I think at the end of the day, we're still able to produce really effective technology and products. Like the economy is still functioning. I feel like this is different from the S…

  16. comment
    Comment #48764799

    We were stuck in the Gilded Age for decades before Roosevelt came along and started big trust-busting efforts. I expect a similar situation to play out here. We're probably in the …

  17. comment
    Comment #48736371

    Now this... this is a hot take. How exactly do you expect these companies to "help humanity" if they're bleeding money?

  18. comment
  19. comment
    Comment #48736192

    I wish I had a good answer to give you here. I really don't understand financial markets. I more so just have a basic understanding of history and technology - my individual stock …

  20. comment
    Comment #48736043

    ... does it? Are you seeing something I'm not seeing? Number one is that this just doesn't appear to be true (non-lite versions beat it across the board it seems), number two is th…

  21. comment
    Comment #48720541

    This is probably a hot take and I am by no means a financial expert and this is probably quite wrong. I personally think that attempting to value these companies using the same met…

  22. comment
  23. comment
    Comment #48680293

    What are you even talking about? Everyone knows that Anthropic is drastically subsidizing their plans. It's actually the exact opposite of what you're talking about. The costs are …

  24. comment
    Comment #48664746

    Yeah, it's not that computer use is the most theoretically optimal paradigm, but there's a reasonable case that given the constraints of modern software systems and how they're bui…

  25. comment
    Comment #48653194

    It depends on what you consider ineffectual to mean. Ineffectual at making new products and innovating? Yes, definitely. Ineffectual at preserving business momentum and continuing …