Viewing profile — uejfiweun
uejfiweun
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Aug 07, 2021, 8:15 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,877
- Public activity
- 1,059 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About uejfiweun
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49223245
Yeah, this most certainly isn't happening.
-
comment
Comment #49197566
Bizarre! Love it :)
-
comment
Comment #49192681
I think Google realized that it's more profitable to sell compute to AI labs than to make AI. They are not an ideologically driven company like Anthropic. They very much turned int…
-
comment
Comment #49111421
It's funny how Google is essentially trying to compete with the software side of Tesla only - Waymos (which AFAIK they plan to partner with major automakers), now this, etc.
-
comment
Comment #49042561
Is it really so hard to understand that open models are behind and yet they are also continually improving and way better than they were a year ago? Like I'm not sure what your poi…
-
comment
Comment #49008725
This is such a smooth-brain reply, dude. The capability literally exists, today. You're telling me that it's just SO fantastical that people will be able to catch up? Give me a bre…
-
comment
Comment #49002237
All you've said needs the qualifier - "for now!" Look at the trend line. It's clear that if they're not yet at the level of being "good enough" for coding, they will be soon. Sensa…
-
comment
Comment #48993830
I know that Flash is obviously no Opus or Fable. That being said, when I want a very quick response, my go-to is Gemini Flash. It's just really damn fast and generally tends to be …
-
comment
Comment #48958979
This was notably one of the "training programs" that Neo went through in The Matrix, along with a variety of other martial art styles.
-
comment
Comment #48943619
Fable is very bad at wasting tokens when it comes to doing these renderings and diffs - I had the exact same experience as you.
-
comment
Comment #48856833
What makes you think the supply crunch is short-term?
-
comment
Comment #48809581
The reason is because AI is viewed by the powers that be as inexorably linked to national security. If you haven't noticed, every lab out there has the same excuse when pressed abo…
-
comment
Comment #48808398
Of course not. This coming crash will be where we learn that tech is "too big to fail" in the same way that the financial system is. They'll let one player fail (likely Anthropic, …
-
comment
Comment #48788658
What are you talking about? We're literally in the middle of one of the most transformative technological revolutions we've ever had.
-
comment
Comment #48768800
I think at the end of the day, we're still able to produce really effective technology and products. Like the economy is still functioning. I feel like this is different from the S…
-
comment
Comment #48764799
We were stuck in the Gilded Age for decades before Roosevelt came along and started big trust-busting efforts. I expect a similar situation to play out here. We're probably in the …
-
comment
Comment #48736371
Now this... this is a hot take. How exactly do you expect these companies to "help humanity" if they're bleeding money?
-
comment
Comment #48736273
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #48736192
I wish I had a good answer to give you here. I really don't understand financial markets. I more so just have a basic understanding of history and technology - my individual stock …
-
comment
Comment #48736043
... does it? Are you seeing something I'm not seeing? Number one is that this just doesn't appear to be true (non-lite versions beat it across the board it seems), number two is th…
-
comment
Comment #48720541
This is probably a hot take and I am by no means a financial expert and this is probably quite wrong. I personally think that attempting to value these companies using the same met…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48680293
What are you even talking about? Everyone knows that Anthropic is drastically subsidizing their plans. It's actually the exact opposite of what you're talking about. The costs are …
-
comment
Comment #48664746
Yeah, it's not that computer use is the most theoretically optimal paradigm, but there's a reasonable case that given the constraints of modern software systems and how they're bui…
-
comment
Comment #48653194
It depends on what you consider ineffectual to mean. Ineffectual at making new products and innovating? Yes, definitely. Ineffectual at preserving business momentum and continuing …