Viewing profile — topranks
topranks
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Aug 17, 2016, 10:46 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 764
- Public activity
- 547 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About topranks
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49154917
You might be anti-ai in the sense you aren’t comfortable with all your data being shipped back and forth to a third party.
-
comment
Comment #49080294
Yeah I don’t think they are over-priced, last I checked all those companies are still losing money hand over fist. I guess the question is more he doesn’t want people catching up b…
-
comment
Comment #48796412
Also all the bad food choices me and my fellow stoners make when we’re high.
-
comment
Comment #48710891
Yeah but messaging apps are really only useful if there are lots of people on them to message. So in the real world a relatively small number of providers, WhatsApp, Signal etc, ar…
-
comment
Comment #48706368
Really hope they aren’t forced to do that. Apple TV one of the few streamers with decent quality audio. We don’t need a “loudness war” for TV and movie content.
-
comment
Comment #48706345
You’re way off here. Conflating DCT-based compression of audio data (like MP3) to dynamic-range compression of an audio signal (as done on an audio compressor during production) sh…
-
comment
Comment #48706311
Uh huh. What people are now talking about here is to normalise the “average volume” (by using compression to increase it, or just lowering the volume to decrease). The problem is t…
-
comment
Comment #48706272
You “turn it up” by using dynamic range compression. Which is fundamentally altering the work. It’s right and proper YouTube do not do this to people’s work.
-
comment
Comment #48706268
Because content creators have a right to produce audio how they want. If it’s a video of someone speaking in a quiet voice it shouldn’t have to have an average volume level of a ne…
-
comment
Comment #48706214
Replaygain works reasonably well for modern music, as do the LUFS units. The problem with video content is there can be extended very quiet parts. If you try to bring the “average”…
-
comment
Comment #48696446
But the training expense is part of their costs! The question is can they just stop training at some point, fixing the models in time, and still have a useful product.
-
comment
Comment #48642767
It definitely costs them a lot. Implementing v6 without doubt saves money for ISPs. Especially in the CGNAT game as those boxes aren’t cheap.
-
comment
Comment #48642744
Exactly. And because the infra was never public in the US, and thus no “privatisation with rules”, it’s been a bit of a disaster.
-
comment
Comment #48642734
Indeed. This is a funny legacy of how telecoms was run and regulated in different countries. Now the US has the least consumer choice, and shitty ISP practices from exploiting peer…
-
comment
Comment #48642723
Was that real DIA?? I’ve seen this commonly from them with residential service. They mostly give you a private v4 address behind CGNAT in addition to IPv6. If you want a public v4 …
-
comment
Comment #48642662
A lot of web scraping. The ones that got KimWolf’d were/are doing a lot of DDoS (SYN floods etc).
-
comment
Comment #48642655
It’s very tricky because the IPs are all on normal user ranges you can’t block without blocking those users. The company behind this blog - spur.us - offer some paid services I thi…
-
comment
Comment #48642627
VPN ranges at least are obvious so that’s different. Tor less so but it doesn’t seem to be commonly used for this kind of abuse.
-
comment
Comment #48642581
Absolutely. Bear in mind the scrapers wouldn’t need to use these proxies were they not being blocked by the sites they are scraping. So it’s being used to evade blocks. For some co…
-
comment
Comment #48642543
Nah it’s messing up peoples home internet, and massively abused to perform denial of service attacks and scraping of web content by large AI companies who are otherwise blocked. Yo…
-
comment
Comment #48642509
I connect every few months (with cable) to check for firmware updates and the like. Otherwise agree it stays offline.
-
comment
Comment #48636565
This is to frustrate those using distillation techniques to train their own models right?
-
comment
Comment #48522892
There is, see my other reply. CDs are able to store much louder tracks than can be cut on a record. The technical reason things on CD got louder is because they could.
-
comment
Comment #48522878
CD has better dynamic range, sure. But a CD is also able to represent a signal with _much less dynamic range_ than it’s possible to cut on a record. It was the move to digital that…
-
comment
Comment #48409512
ULAs are standards compliant but tbh it's a layer of complexity I rather not have. Just give me GUAs and be done with it.