Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — tomlockwood

tomlockwood

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jun 05, 2019, 7:13 AM UTC
HN karma
1,471
Public activity
773 items

About tomlockwood

lockwood.dev

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49178999

    Bun now has a rule for github actions to chastise robobun if it leaves a long comment: "If you need a paragraph-long comment to justify why the workaround is OK, the code is wrong …

  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #49084317

    Jarred from Bun is in this comment section saying the rewrite isn't finished yet. I therefore don't consider it a failure or a success. I'll be keen to see how much the CI cost tho…

  4. comment
    Comment #49084218

    "Let them eat cake!"

  5. comment
    Comment #49079625

    Personally I think the cost does matter.

  6. comment
    Comment #49079264

    Yeah if you want you can check out my github page to see some tool failures. Nobody is hyping those up, though.

  7. comment
    Comment #49076761

    You've got my blessing. I think given how mistaken I am, it should be quite an engaging article.

  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #49076070

    It isn't clear to me that the price is worth it.

  10. comment
    Comment #49076056

    Author here: Exactly. I had a funny thought that Bun might add a release tag while I was still writing the article. In that case I'd still publish it, because the point is we still…

  11. comment
    Comment #49071195

    Please feel free to write an article that corrects my mistakes.

  12. comment
    Comment #49070968

    I link to Jarred's writeup on bun.com, where you'll note he mentions that its being used on Prisma and Claude Code. I don't agree that using something in a very specific environmen…

  13. comment
    Comment #49070877

    Author here: I don't need or want another Bun release or an NPM release or anything like that. Like I very clearly say in the article I just got chatting with a peer about the Bun …

  14. comment
    Comment #49070662

    I mention Anthropic dogfooding this in the article.

  15. comment
    Comment #49070614

    I don't think that's true. I think a fair chunk of them are places where Bun is handed a pointer by WebKit or something similar. I believe they write about this a little.

  16. comment
    Comment #49070492

    From the article: > The goal of a postmortem is to draw meaningful conclusions to help you learn from your past successes and failures. Despite its grim-sounding name, a postmortem…

  17. comment
    Comment #49070404

    I thought it was a fairly common turn of phrase! https://blog.codinghorror.com/the-project-postmortem/

  18. comment
    Comment #49070086

    [flagged]

  19. comment
    Comment #49069358

    Ohhhhh for a world where that's peanuts for an open source project.

  20. comment
    Comment #49069110

    That's absolutely correct!

  21. comment
    Comment #49068872

    > I am none the wiser about how it's going. You and me both friend!

  22. comment
    Comment #49068710

    More proof that it was written by a human!!!

  23. comment
    Comment #49068540

    Author here: I'm also not sure how much we can glean from any of that!!! I look forward to Anthropic or Bun releasing a retrospective after their next release that fully outlines t…

  24. comment
    Comment #49068350

    Not sure! I cludged together a counter using git log. I could go back and redo it but I think the number would serve my point either way.

  25. comment
    Comment #49068234

    Author here: An apology on the graphs, they just count rust files touched in commits, not total commits. So if there were two commits and one touched 3 .rs files and another touche…