Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — throwaway2245

throwaway2245

HN member
Joined
Sat, Feb 22, 2020, 9:45 PM UTC
HN karma
1,043
Public activity
609 items

About throwaway2245

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #26119990

    You could double that number to account for the "fraud and error" spend at DWP: I would presume that further spending in this regard is dedicated to other departments.

  2. comment
    Comment #26119646

    I would count coordination here as a deep technical skill, which requires a depth of study and/or experience. You are selling your coordination skills. It's the stick of the T.

  3. comment
    Comment #26119462

    People who have broad interests with no depth of knowledge have not identified (for themselves) where their value lies. I would imagine that this type of engineer needs to be caref…

  4. comment
    Comment #26119414

    Requiring "means testing", i.e. excluding people who are not in need, is often shown to cost more money than it saves. (and allows some people who don't technically qualify to fall…

  5. comment
    Comment #26119359

    > The market price for a referral is negative. Businesses would normally pay to seek them out. By threatening to withdraw from a national market, Google seem to be saying that its …

  6. comment
    Comment #26118076

    I think the video evidence people wish to collect is exactly the evidence that you are wrong - that people get arrested (or perhaps brutalized, or killed) despite being wholly resp…

  7. comment
    Comment #26116022

    I learned recently that the Food Pyramid was created by the Department of Agriculture in the US, i.e. not by the Department of Health. So, not experts. (Not in the field they were …

  8. comment
    Comment #26115985

    I would wager that "Reject All" does not, in fact, opt you out of "Legitimate Interests" - sites are using the language "Object to Legitimate Interests" for this.

  9. comment
    Comment #26114305

    If the drug is granting people willpower , then it really is miraculous.

  10. comment
    Comment #26114257

    > Security by obscurity replied to hacking Considering that Wikipedia dates the concept and its rejection back to 1851, you have understood it wrong.

  11. comment
    Comment #26114188

    Being overweight/obese might be (and might not be) a side-effect of the things you list, but it also that causes its own further side-effects and is worth dealing with in its own r…

  12. comment
    Comment #26113778

    The principle of 'obscurity is not security' would seem to apply to anti-spam algorithms on the scale of Google. I suspect that Google are not claiming this law would interfere wit…

  13. comment
    Comment #26113598

    This page doesn't contain the word 'spam' - is that actually Google's claim, or are you inferring it?

  14. comment
    Comment #26113557

    I am not clever enough to understand this analogy, at all. Why would Google be opening a coffee shop? Could you please translate this analogy into the factual situation, so that I …

  15. comment
    Comment #26112479

    > What the nobility had to offer peasants was safety. The purpose of the article, as I read it, is to identify that this claim was written into history by the nobility.

  16. comment
  17. comment
    Comment #26109135

    This is simply wrong. Most people are unlikely to reach top 1% for income in any one year of their lifetime. The top 1% for wealth is even a much higher bar to reach: you need to h…

  18. comment
    Comment #26109071

    London financial industry traders and London voting residents are not related. Greater London residents voted overall ~60% to Remain, but you'd expect that traders live in the East…

  19. comment
  20. comment
    Comment #26103716

    > making money less able to purchase power you could achieve this by: giving everyone a basic amount of money, so they are on a more equal footing to benefit from opportunities.

  21. comment
  22. comment
    Comment #26100440

    Primarily, the employer benefits - which is particularly evident in this case. They can ask the applicant to do the work to prove themselves, with the pretence of an available job,…

  23. comment
    Comment #26100285

    I say "They asked OP to do a bunch of wasted work on the off-chance that their prize candidate was not available - even though they were not (under no circumstances) interested in …

  24. comment
    Comment #26096286

    I think it depends (similar to other comments): Either, you are engaging the kid's own personal interest in the thing, which has the potential to grow independently of you as a par…

  25. comment
    Comment #26096210

    I disagree with your statement that it was respectful. Accepting your scenario, this suggests that they did not really want to hire the candidate and at best thought they might set…