Viewing profile — throw1235435
throw1235435
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Apr 14, 2025, 8:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 39
- Public activity
- 56 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About throw1235435
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47160693
I don't think you are wrong. I find many tech people/founders excited by AI don't understand end game economics in general. Like kids excited by the new toy starting their new star…
-
comment
Comment #46941888
Changed their opinion/public stance completely sometimes only months apart. For example "I love programming" to "if you aren't with AI you are behind" within maybe only 6 months ti…
-
comment
Comment #46938134
Generally from a financial planning standpoint 35-50 is typically the "grinding years" where mortgage, family, and other life commitments means that typically your career investmen…
-
comment
Comment #46937962
Software, and most STEM based jobs, have a lot of determinism and verifiability + some way to reduce the cost of failure so brute force iteration can cover up the remaining. There …
-
comment
Comment #46937768
What's more interesting is how the big names in our industry, the ones who already made their money as you say, have turned quickly since the end of 2025. I think even the most old…
-
comment
Comment #46891077
A lot of startups/small businesses are like "with AI we can build more than ever". The problem is so can everyone else and capitalism rewards scarcity not value. The bar for startu…
-
comment
Comment #46655633
The language is still ahead of C#, and still receiving features and keeping up by and large with the .NET ecosystem. Tbh I don't get the sheer negativity; the same thing could be s…
-
comment
Comment #46599087
> They are laughing at them. Yes but not for the reason you think - more that those are the future customers. If you look closely most are pivoting slowly away from software and sh…
-
comment
Comment #46597119
There's a lot of this forum in exactly that position. The fear is real; there is a real risk this AI destroys families and people's lives in the disruption.
-
comment
Comment #46594390
This is what will occur - the bad scenario that is. Labor and its knowledge distributes (hard to contain knowledge), capital centralises and compounds. Always been that way. With A…
-
comment
Comment #46581295
Sure; I absolutely agree and more to the point SWE's and their ideologies compared to other professions have meant they are the first on the chopping block. But what do you tell th…
-
comment
Comment #46580715
Software dev's training the model with their code making themselves obsolete is encouraged not banned. Claude code making itself obsolete is banned.
-
comment
Comment #46532009
If that is true; then all the commentary around software people having jobs still due to "taste" and other nice words is just that. Commentary. In the end the higher level stuff st…
-
comment
Comment #46531882
Not entirely disagreeing with your point but I think they've mostly been forced to pivot recently for their own sakes; they will never say it though. As much as they may seem eager…
-
comment
Comment #46483852
Not sure. As software becomes a commodity I can see the "old school" like tech slowing down (e.g. programming languages, frameworks frontend and backend, etc). The need for a bette…
-
comment
Comment #46457595
Maybe. There the cost of failure again is low. Its easier to destroy than to create. Economic disruption to workers will take a bit longer I think. Don't get me wrong; I hope that …
-
comment
Comment #46452906
The question is how rapid the adoption is. The price of failure in the real world is much higher ($$$, environmental, physical risks) vs just "rebuild/regenerate" in the digital re…
-
comment
Comment #46452380
> But otherwise I think it's harmful to society, even if beneficial to the individuals I disagree a little in that stability/predictability to people also adds some benefit to soci…
-
comment
Comment #46452341
How many pay? And out of that how many are willing to pay the amount to at least cover the inference costs (not loss leading?) Outside the verifiable domains I think the impact is …
-
comment
Comment #46452243
Not really. I used to think more general with the first generation of LLM's but given all progress since o1 is RL based I'm thinking most disruption will happen in open productive …
-
comment
Comment #46451231
I also believe this - I think it will probably just disrupt software engineering and any other digital medium with mass internet publication (i.e. things RLVR can use). For the sho…
-
comment
Comment #46450108
Tbh this whole AI thing is probably a negative ROI but it will pay off. Even if the debt is written off the AI enhancements that this whole misallocation of capital created are now…
-
comment
Comment #46439251
Sure - I agree with that, and I agree its good for society but as you state probably not as good for the SWE who has to work harder for the same which was my point and I think you …
-
comment
Comment #46439123
I'm talking about what I perceive to be the median salary/conditions with big tech being only a part of that. My point is more that I remember back in that period good salaries cou…
-
comment
Comment #46438683
There's also the effect of different models. Until the most recent models, especially for concise algorithms, I felt it was still easier to sometimes do it myself (i.e. a good algo…