Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — throw1235435

throw1235435

HN member
Joined
Mon, Apr 14, 2025, 8:34 PM UTC
HN karma
39
Public activity
56 items

About throw1235435

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47160693

    I don't think you are wrong. I find many tech people/founders excited by AI don't understand end game economics in general. Like kids excited by the new toy starting their new star…

  2. comment
    Comment #46941888

    Changed their opinion/public stance completely sometimes only months apart. For example "I love programming" to "if you aren't with AI you are behind" within maybe only 6 months ti…

  3. comment
    Comment #46938134

    Generally from a financial planning standpoint 35-50 is typically the "grinding years" where mortgage, family, and other life commitments means that typically your career investmen…

  4. comment
    Comment #46937962

    Software, and most STEM based jobs, have a lot of determinism and verifiability + some way to reduce the cost of failure so brute force iteration can cover up the remaining. There …

  5. comment
    Comment #46937768

    What's more interesting is how the big names in our industry, the ones who already made their money as you say, have turned quickly since the end of 2025. I think even the most old…

  6. comment
    Comment #46891077

    A lot of startups/small businesses are like "with AI we can build more than ever". The problem is so can everyone else and capitalism rewards scarcity not value. The bar for startu…

  7. comment
    Comment #46655633

    The language is still ahead of C#, and still receiving features and keeping up by and large with the .NET ecosystem. Tbh I don't get the sheer negativity; the same thing could be s…

  8. comment
    Comment #46599087

    > They are laughing at them. Yes but not for the reason you think - more that those are the future customers. If you look closely most are pivoting slowly away from software and sh…

  9. comment
    Comment #46597119

    There's a lot of this forum in exactly that position. The fear is real; there is a real risk this AI destroys families and people's lives in the disruption.

  10. comment
    Comment #46594390

    This is what will occur - the bad scenario that is. Labor and its knowledge distributes (hard to contain knowledge), capital centralises and compounds. Always been that way. With A…

  11. comment
    Comment #46581295

    Sure; I absolutely agree and more to the point SWE's and their ideologies compared to other professions have meant they are the first on the chopping block. But what do you tell th…

  12. comment
    Comment #46580715

    Software dev's training the model with their code making themselves obsolete is encouraged not banned. Claude code making itself obsolete is banned.

  13. comment
    Comment #46532009

    If that is true; then all the commentary around software people having jobs still due to "taste" and other nice words is just that. Commentary. In the end the higher level stuff st…

  14. comment
    Comment #46531882

    Not entirely disagreeing with your point but I think they've mostly been forced to pivot recently for their own sakes; they will never say it though. As much as they may seem eager…

  15. comment
    Comment #46483852

    Not sure. As software becomes a commodity I can see the "old school" like tech slowing down (e.g. programming languages, frameworks frontend and backend, etc). The need for a bette…

  16. comment
    Comment #46457595

    Maybe. There the cost of failure again is low. Its easier to destroy than to create. Economic disruption to workers will take a bit longer I think. Don't get me wrong; I hope that …

  17. comment
    Comment #46452906

    The question is how rapid the adoption is. The price of failure in the real world is much higher ($$$, environmental, physical risks) vs just "rebuild/regenerate" in the digital re…

  18. comment
    Comment #46452380

    > But otherwise I think it's harmful to society, even if beneficial to the individuals I disagree a little in that stability/predictability to people also adds some benefit to soci…

  19. comment
    Comment #46452341

    How many pay? And out of that how many are willing to pay the amount to at least cover the inference costs (not loss leading?) Outside the verifiable domains I think the impact is …

  20. comment
    Comment #46452243

    Not really. I used to think more general with the first generation of LLM's but given all progress since o1 is RL based I'm thinking most disruption will happen in open productive …

  21. comment
    Comment #46451231

    I also believe this - I think it will probably just disrupt software engineering and any other digital medium with mass internet publication (i.e. things RLVR can use). For the sho…

  22. comment
    Comment #46450108

    Tbh this whole AI thing is probably a negative ROI but it will pay off. Even if the debt is written off the AI enhancements that this whole misallocation of capital created are now…

  23. comment
    Comment #46439251

    Sure - I agree with that, and I agree its good for society but as you state probably not as good for the SWE who has to work harder for the same which was my point and I think you …

  24. comment
    Comment #46439123

    I'm talking about what I perceive to be the median salary/conditions with big tech being only a part of that. My point is more that I remember back in that period good salaries cou…

  25. comment
    Comment #46438683

    There's also the effect of different models. Until the most recent models, especially for concise algorithms, I felt it was still easier to sometimes do it myself (i.e. a good algo…