Viewing profile — terminalshort
terminalshort
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jul 13, 2025, 10:14 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,795
- Public activity
- 1,329 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About terminalshort
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47511025
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47511009
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47497158
My "plan" is don't make big long term plans
-
comment
Comment #47495125
The doesn't cause acid rain version is called "clean" and that seems pretty fair to me when the other version causes acid rain.
-
comment
Comment #47495093
Smart people know that you can't predict or plan for anything on anywhere close to that time horizon. The only plan is be adaptable.
-
comment
Comment #47495080
Depends on the mutation, but it could be as little as 1. A single mutation could turn the virus inert, therefore making it legal.
-
comment
Comment #47494885
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #47485948
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #47485043
Because it's the government they voted in. Typical American take. Wanting no responsibility for the adverse effects of your decision.
-
comment
Comment #47485033
Didn't happen
-
comment
Comment #47485019
The fact that Iran has now launched missiles at civilian areas in a dozen or so countries unrelated to the war shows that this is clearly false.
-
comment
Comment #47484790
Yeah, things change. What do you propose to do about that? The only people who lose are the ones who can't accept that they may need to change careers to make more money.
-
comment
Comment #47484731
To use your example of someone working on the plumbing of an accounts payable system, who is passionate about that? The supply is near zero. That, like most jobs, is going to need …
-
comment
Comment #47451440
The mall cop much more so than the ICC
-
comment
Comment #47443342
Yes, the US and not just the presidency. If it was just the presidency then he would have been impeached by congress for usurping their constitutional authority.
-
comment
Comment #47443328
They have the power to enforce laws
-
comment
Comment #47441449
If you and I, the president, congress, and the judiciary agree, then yes, and that's kind of the situation regarding the laws around starting a war.
-
comment
Comment #47441102
No it's not and neither is Afroman's statement. But the comment I was replying to said it was a fair statement, not merely that it is not defamatory.
-
comment
Comment #47441074
That's exactly correct. Laws are not a physical entity and therefore their existence is predicated entirely on collective agreement.
-
comment
Comment #47441006
Of course it's not defamation. But that's not what you said. You said "seems fair"
-
comment
Comment #47440960
Of course I can. He even uses the same trick of not calling it a "war"
-
comment
Comment #47440914
Congress made its mistake a long time ago. Power is very difficult to reclaim once it has been relinquished. And it didn't even take a Caesar crossing the Rubicon in our case.
-
comment
Comment #47440748
It isn't obeyed or enforced and, therefore, is not the law. I won't read it as there is no point in doing so because it is not the law.
-
comment
Comment #47440700
It's been the established president since the Korean War when the US began ignoring the constitutional provision that gave congress the power to declare war. Additional examples ar…
-
comment
Comment #47440611
Add what you like. I can't possibly take anyone who uses the term "climate denier" seriously.