Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ta20240528

ta20240528

HN member
Joined
Tue, May 28, 2024, 8:30 AM UTC
HN karma
308
Public activity
226 items

About ta20240528

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49254005

    Here's how you can stop it: no national licences to distribute power, telecommunications, medicine, fuel, etc. Even some software. Then you will have to have regional duplicates of…

  2. comment
    Comment #49144622

    "you can’t stop talking about yourself, but from an earnest yearning to share authentically". Well, that killed it for me. Talking? Honestly? Dear lord, no.

  3. comment
    Comment #49068873

    "also much worse …" Why is convicting and sentencing criminals a bad thing?

  4. comment
    Comment #49055486

    "The amount of water used is somewhat less important than what the source of the water is." Where I live, the golf courses are the largest and often only consumers of recycled wate…

  5. comment
    Comment #49010494

    The Europeans didn't think it was a bluff. But more generally, when the foundation of your country's morality is "all men are created equal" you really have given up the space to o…

  6. comment
    Comment #49010030

    [flagged]

  7. comment
    Comment #48645304

    Huh, a lot on the 737 Max situation was due to standardisation. Boeing didn't want the time, expense, and hassle of certifying (= standardising) a new narrow-body aeroplane, so the…

  8. comment
    Comment #48441975

    "climate doomerism" Just a reminder that actual adult scientists at the ACS (American Chemical Society) have calculated (for all to see) that the excess heat being trapped just ove…

  9. comment
    Comment #48233591

    "they also send thousands of sex-spies" Could they send one (or two) my way?

  10. comment
    Comment #48196087

    And when you here unsubstantiated rumours* that ­say Anthropic has been sending exchanges to say Alibaba's Qwen, will you als oconclude the same about the entire US AI industry? I …

  11. comment
    Comment #47985260

    "Especially outside of US market." A euphemism in polite company for: we'll ban them on national security grounds like we did with cars and phones.

  12. comment
    Comment #47985198

    … for which (if you think women are equal) they should receive the Nobel Peace Prize. (Husband and father of daughters).

  13. comment
    Comment #47983741

    "A company incorporated in the EU, even if it is owned by an entity in the US, is not subject to US jurisdiction and so that does not apply." Incorrect, this is EXACTLY the scenari…

  14. comment
    Comment #47922560

    You are incorrect: 1. the 2018 CLOUD Act mandates US companies — and their subsidiaries — to provide information to the US government on demand, regardless of where the data is sto…

  15. comment
    Comment #47848442

    "The purpose of software is to provide value to the customer." Partially correct. The purpose of your software to its owners is also to provide future value to customers competitiv…

  16. comment
    Comment #47465989

    For active soldiers, yes - kill them, any time, anywhere. That's what "at war" means. Its not a policing operation.

  17. comment
    Comment #47465962

    Oh stop being so self-loathing: Israel was created by a mandate from the League of Nations. So, most of the planet (1) (1) Well, excluding Ethiopia because they still thought it wa…

  18. comment
    Comment #47451007

    China. If they wanted to.

  19. comment
    Comment #47450997

    Come now American people, The UK and France have long had a project 'on the shelf' to substitute the missiles with the French M51 ballistic missiles. They don't want to do it, they…

  20. comment
    Comment #47440616

    "The concern about a new dependency on China is real," The dependency is latent, is only become a problem when you (USA) does something to dick with China's dependency on you. If y…

  21. comment
    Comment #47438368

    You are mistaking the battle for the war: Denmark / EU would no doubt lose the BATTLE for Greenland. Within hours. But the sun would rise the next day and the USA won't like the 'n…

  22. comment
    Comment #47438055

    You clearly don't know British understatement. Firing on one British officer would be as bad a firing on 10000. It's about lines.

  23. comment
    Comment #47438025

    Nah mate, Rich powerful countries could also keep slaves and no one would be able to stop it by force. But they don't. Civilisation advances.

  24. comment
    Comment #47437977

    The UK only had to send a single officer to Greenland to stop Trump's previous attempt to annex Greenland. That was a signal, thankfully there are still adults in the USA who recog…

  25. comment
    Comment #47286771

    From The United States Uniform Code of Military Justice: "Attacking civilians is unequivocally a war crime". https://ucmj.us/is-attacking-civilians-a-war-crime/ @dang: you've banne…