Viewing profile — tMcGrath
tMcGrath
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Aug 10, 2011, 8:42 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 77
- Public activity
- 26 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About tMcGrath
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42496800
Yes - we'd never normally turn features up this much as it breaks the model quite badly, but we put this in the post to show what that looked like in practice.
-
comment
Comment #42496725
Thank you! I think some of the features we have like conditional steering make SAEs a lot more convenient to use. It also makes using models a lot more like conventional programmin…
-
comment
Comment #42496666
We'll be open-sourcing these SAEs so you're not required to do this if you'd rather self-host.
-
comment
Comment #42496647
We're planning to release the weights once we do a moderation pass. Our SAE was trained on LMSys (you can see this in our accompanying post: https://www.goodfire.ai/papers/mapping-…
-
comment
Comment #42496250
I'm one of the authors of this paper - happy to answer any questions you might have.
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #28154923
The paper is measuring I/O behaviour, rather than the complexity of the mechanisms generating that behaviour. Transistors might have quite complex physics, but are designed to have…
-
comment
Comment #26242968
I'm not sure that's all there is to it - at least some scientists are in it for the explanation: they want to know more about something. In this case the prediction is just a usefu…
-
comment
Comment #19502098
Modern Classical Physics is a great book - I've recently started working through it (just about to move on to chapter 2). I'd be interested in chatting about it with others/cross-c…
-
comment
Comment #19502042
As far as I know, a good differential-geometric understanding of nonequilibrium thermodynamics still hasn't been achieved. The central issue is understanding how changes in control…
-
comment
Comment #18819261
As I understand it her point it that what we take to be fundamental particles have certain properties - charge, spin, etc - and no others. If they had other properties, this would …
-
comment
Comment #17669921
I think the standard reference is probably Spivak's 'Calculus on Manifolds' but this never really did it for me. If you have a background in physics then some combination of Nakaha…
-
comment
Comment #16275150
In this case that's not true though - the article is about someone who used critical thinking/reasoning skills to make a huge amount of money, and credits this in large part to his…
-
comment
Comment #15668928
I'd like to flag up this paper on HMC and minibatch inference: https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01510v1 . It seems that SGHMC might not always behave as well as you might like. I should …
-
comment
Comment #15608604
I agree - it's a surprising and cool paper. There has been some work done on fooling network ensembles by constructing constructing a Bayesian posterior over weights using dropout …
-
comment
Comment #15602911
You are absolutely right that a lot of work to date (especially in applications and metrics-driven research) has focused on 'functions for vision problems'. But this is far from th…
-
comment
Comment #15602792
As commenters elsewhere have pointed out, this really only caps salary at around £60k - this is actually pretty low for an experienced ML engineer. I've heard Prof Pantic advocate …
-
comment
Comment #15602699
I suppose it's limited by the size of 'the set of things you can do with functions'. This seems like a large enough set that I wouldn't be worried about hitting its limits too soon…
-
comment
Comment #15526170
There's a reason the axes are left unlabeled in this graph. If you look at a paper that gives values over time for these quantities you'll find that this 'effect' mounts up to abou…
-
comment
Comment #13249503
There's also an interesting set of applications in statistical physics: many systems can be modelled by Markov chains whose rate parameters can change through time. Changing these …
-
comment
Comment #6949853
For statistics I can really recommend 'All of Statistics' by Larry Wasserman ( http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~larry/all-of-statistics/ ) It runs through a lot of important topics, partic…
-
comment
Comment #5704428
If you want to approach physics from a mathematical background I strongly recommend Peter Szekeres' book 'A Course in Modern Mathematical Physics' http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/0…
-
comment
Comment #5704292
I've been reading this and it's fantastic - approaching the subject from the tools needed to understand the way the material works mathematically (Lagrangians etc) rather than as a…