Viewing profile — stingraycharles
stingraycharles
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jul 13, 2009, 5:58 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 16,081
- Public activity
- 4,007 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About stingraycharles
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49221057
Ok so this is a bit of a side note, but when reading this, did anyone else have the feeling that, for all their messaging around “we are so afraid that our models will be used for …
-
comment
Comment #49219089
It is a systemic issue, though, when the system enables these certain actors to remain in position and cause the community to break apart like it’s doing.
-
comment
Comment #49218315
“Our experience is that the Steering Committee as an institution lacks a native instinct for the delegation envisioned by the constitution, while also not being sufficiently engage…
-
comment
Comment #49217386
That’s very much up for debate.
-
comment
Comment #49208181
It’s temporary revenue, it’s not as if those businesses are suddenly fundamentally better. To me it seems like they’re just riding the AI hype out, expecting a crash after, and not…
-
comment
Comment #49208169
What’s wrong with a signature?
-
comment
Comment #49208132
You’re right, but it seems like the punishments are not really about that, but just a general “protect the children” and age verification system. > Instead, the court ordered Meta …
-
comment
Comment #49206789
I think Apple much rather tells users that this is exactly what they warned them about when they were forced to support USB-C and will advise users to only buy official cables from…
-
comment
Comment #49205641
This really needs to have a lot more evidence that it’s because GitHub’s code is being written by AI vs them being bombarded by activity from all kinds of AI agents all over the wo…
-
comment
Comment #49205113
Didn’t Anthropic acquire Cerebras? Seems like a move into the same direction. I also think that etching models into ASICs may be a bit too inflexible for what OpenAI and Anthropic …
-
comment
Comment #49197789
It's really not designed as much of a security model as a liability model. When the AI isn't responsible for the decisions, a whole category of liability goes away.
-
comment
Comment #49192321
Isn’t another aspect of it that it’s sufficiently random / unrecognizable, for example? I’m very much aware of the differences between symmetric and asymmetric encryption, and real…
-
comment
Comment #49191766
Yeah, I wouldn’t say with certainty that LLMs will never break any symmetrical crypto algorithm. It will certainly require a lot of effort, but so does solving some hard math chall…
-
comment
Comment #49191413
Seems pretty clear to me: enable it for the projects you want, and there’s a 1M / 10M token limit per day, depending on the model you use. Assuming an average context size of 100k …
-
comment
Comment #49176334
> JavaScript was a mistake, e-commerce was a mistake, and so is everything else that came after. That’s a really extreme take that lacks any nuance. Might as well blame the OS as w…
-
comment
Comment #49165918
This sounds like FUD unless backed by evidence. Cloudflare’s inference absolutely does support ZDR, as long as you use unified billing (ie not using BYOK).
-
comment
Comment #49165902
Isn’t that already in detail by the research of these quantization techniques?
-
comment
Comment #49165214
What is this kind of unprofessional blog-style rant doing on OpenAI’s website? Shouldn’t this be settled between the two companies themselves rather than trying to play the court o…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49145211
I think the problem is that the Box / Map / any stuff and all the explicit declarations that Go requires makes it harder. In Haskell as well, you can let the compiler infer a lot o…
-
comment
Comment #49141954
my post was never intended as Go bashing, I use Go a lot and appreciate its simplicity. am I tearing something down in my comment?
-
comment
Comment #49140501
Am I the only one who’s absolutely shocked that Go finally is embracing generics? Does anyone have a bit of an inside view into what changed in the perspectives of the language mai…
-
comment
Comment #49133712
One example from a root cause analysis of a security incident like this is not evidence for “everyone does this”. I believe that Huggingface, with 250+ employees, is an outlier.
-
comment
Comment #49129945
Just don’t switch models every week and you’ll be fine. Especially in production.
-
comment
Comment #49129923
I don’t think everyone does this at all. Maybe very small scale companies, but I would have expected a company like Huggingface to have better security standards. As soon as you’re…