Viewing profile — stillpointlab
stillpointlab
HN member- Joined
- Tue, May 27, 2025, 9:33 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 343
- Public activity
- 102 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About stillpointlab
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49217559
> We have long had the problem that there are more people who want to write code than people willing to review it. I think this is an important thing to mull over. The world is goi…
-
comment
Comment #49174263
It seems possible, in fact reasonable, to understand my observation as following from your assumed "correlation". I gave it context that it is having a conversation with an expert,…
-
comment
Comment #49172059
I agree with this post's gist, and I've certainly noticed how LLMs change their interaction with me once I demonstrate some knowledge. I've often started a technical conversation v…
-
comment
Comment #49135483
Before I officially got into development as a career I had a manual labor job at a local business. They were debugging issues in their operations and brought in a consultant that w…
-
comment
Comment #49027831
That is a good point and I don't mind getting a bit philosophical when I point out that experience is distinct from rationalism. Underneath this there is an argument about empirici…
-
comment
Comment #49027612
It is comforting to find other people experiencing the exact same reality as me, since I see so much in this post that matches my own experience. It reminds me of all the recent ta…
-
comment
Comment #49026425
I was cleaning my office a couple of days ago and found stacks upon stacks of paper. I've had a habit for over a decade of taking printer paper, folding it half length-wise, and sc…
-
comment
Comment #48995702
Today it is SQLite, tomorrow Linux? I'm not sure of the long-term viability of these brute force swarm approaches, but clearly the AI companies dig the marketing they get out of it…
-
comment
Comment #48983012
> but soon models may not need to be updated Which is why my original post mentioned the volatility in models. We aren't just doing research on frontier, there is a huge amount of …
-
comment
Comment #48982898
I think part of this thinking is in reverse. What I mean by that is people are saying something like "Imagine if 18 months ago a company started to create an ASIC based on GPT-4o (…
-
comment
Comment #48982710
I think there is growing confusion in this discussion. I am saying "I see the fixed nature of ASICs creating a barrier to their adoption despite how cheap they are". Many of the re…
-
comment
Comment #48982048
Yes, but the context of the discussion is "who wins the war and how". And you are moving the goal posts very far from the original claim, which is that the speed with which compani…
-
comment
Comment #48981995
I admit I would like a faster model - but even though I have faster models available I still go to Fable or GPT-5.6 90% of the time. So there is a gap between a potential preferenc…
-
comment
Comment #48981801
I mean, if I imagine Anthropic giving away unlimited Sonnet 4.5 away at $20, I would still be paying the $200 for fable. It is a bit like saying "why would you hire someone with a …
-
comment
Comment #48981023
I'm not convinced, mostly because things like crypto, which I believe went into ASICs, were based on very slowly moving and mostly understood algorithms. LLMs and model architectur…
-
comment
Comment #48854696
It may be a lot of cool things but one thing it is not is a web browser.
-
comment
Comment #48851006
I can't try it since it hasn't appeared in my Codex yet, but this is is necessary from OpenAI in my opinion. Fable is just so much better at understanding broad context. I only use…
-
comment
Comment #48850726
> Avoid generic brevity instructions: GPT-5.6 is more sensitive than GPT-5.5 to instructions such as “Be concise,” “Keep it short,” or “Use minimal text.” I used to go to a barber …
-
comment
Comment #48840131
I've just been carefully reading the code. It is easy to slip into just accepting what comes out to speed things up, but reading the code is important. I save myself by skimming th…
-
comment
Comment #48837733
I've had mixed results with downgrading on Fable. I was able to do a complete audit of my OAuth implementation without any issue. But when I asked for an OWASP top-ten review of my…
-
comment
Comment #48689627
I'm pointing out how I noticed a particular emotional response when working with LLMs. I've been an engineering manager in the past and I have tried my best to keep the needs of my…
-
comment
Comment #48688652
I feel on the other side of this. Just yesterday I was reviewing some code output from Claude and I realized a change that I had asked for in a previous review step wasn't what I w…
-
comment
Comment #48654939
I agree, but that is the crux of my initial post. There is a ceiling to how quick I can deliver using LLM coding agents which is the speed at which I can write good enough specs. I…
-
comment
Comment #48654081
It does, but I have to direct it and review it. That means I have to think about it, research it, consider how the new feature or system fits in with the existing feature or system…
-
comment
Comment #48653122
One thesis I am developing is that LLMs have given us a new kind of tradeoff. We can use the intelligence and tremendous speed up that mechanically pumping out basic CRUD code has …