Viewing profile — statop
statop
HN member- Joined
- Wed, May 16, 2018, 5:16 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 30
- Public activity
- 29 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About statop
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #37381045
This comment is very selfawarewolves. I agree, people in this thread are overly concerned with blame attribution, but maybe it's not the group you think. SFFD is highlighting to pe…
-
comment
Comment #37374119
Your stated argument against allowing human control of the vehicle is that it presents a safety issue, implying that you could be car jacked. You could be car jacked while riding i…
-
comment
Comment #37373684
This is a strawman, try again.
-
comment
Comment #37372296
2) sure.. and you won't be happy if someone carjacks your uber either I imagine? get out of the car.
-
comment
Comment #37372244
Ok so the guys and gals who we pay to save your life are saying they're getting in the way. But MLRoboCorporation(TM)(c)(r) says fuck those guys, they can go around? I think I'll s…
-
comment
Comment #37372130
It isn't FUD, it's dumb autonomous vehicles won't get out of the way. Just force them to allow human intervention, a person gets in and moves it. What's the big deal? It shouldn't …
-
comment
Comment #37346502
Do you live in the bay area? “T.T not enough housing!”, except traffic is out of control and we’re just building more massive apartment buildings along every inch of freeway we can…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #36305770
"In May 2020, the Federal Reserve changed the official formula for calculating the M1 money supply. Prior to May 2020, M1 included currency in circulation, demand deposits at comme…
-
comment
Comment #35832391
"My son is 11 and wants to work" "He wants to earn more money than I [want] to pay him" Well which is it. Would he work for free? No? Then he doesn't want to work, he wants money.
-
comment
Comment #35832180
If you took the time to read it, you would know that's not at all what this legislation is about. These regulations existed because children were exploited and taken advantage of i…
-
comment
Comment #35193740
If you think copy and paste is artificial intelligence then there probably isn't much of a discussion to be had here. Yes, very smart and talented people have released ground break…
-
comment
Comment #35192817
It isn't AI, it's a glorified Xerox machine.
-
comment
Comment #34841792
Swerve into oncoming traffic, run red lights, and come dangerously close to hitting cyclists? Who do you think I am, Vin Diesel at the Tour de France? “Objectively safe“ was a pret…
-
comment
Comment #34737284
That isn't how humans work. In any case, most humans are capable of FSD. Your Tesla isn't. No one cares about 360 degree 30Hz cameras. Just like two eyes aren't the solution to dri…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #33117383
But maybe, and hear me out here, FB deserves the shade.
-
comment
Comment #33117332
Yea… nothing I’ve seen from them is compelling. My bet is Mark is going to burn a LOT of money, fail to get mass adoption, cancel the project, and lay the design team off. But who …
-
comment
Comment #30942740
Very compelling. Go on then, tell us why you feel a mask is an infringement on your bodily autonomy but pants shirt shoes aren’t.
-
comment
Comment #30942461
Amazing that in reply to an article about Covid being classified as airborne and transmitted as an aerosol, with specific concern for indoor venues due to wide variation in ventila…
-
comment
Comment #30942357
We didn’t lock down society for 2 years because of Covid either. You can’t even call the US response a lock down. My friends abroad had to register with the government to leave the…
-
comment
Comment #30865430
Don’t waste your time… the Wookiee posted that ivermectin is an effective treatment for Covid just 12 days ago!
-
comment
Comment #30818491
You're right the linked article doesn't mention it. If you search the drivers name and Tesla, other articles do claim that she is not a citizen or permanent resident of Australia a…
-
comment
Comment #30650252
Thanks for linking the article, if you had read the title it says "in kids 5 to 11". The 6th sentence notes that "kids 5 to 11" received a lower dosage. It goes on to reference a s…
- comment