Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — stale2002

stale2002

HN member
Joined
Tue, Dec 16, 2014, 3:12 PM UTC
HN karma
4,459
Public activity
5,488 items

About stale2002

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49251996

    Are you trying to imply, without making any direct argument, that this is never a useful frame of reference? In comparison to cloud services, having access to the assembly code can…

  2. comment
    Comment #49251959

    > You don't get why people would like to be in control of a powerful new technology You will not have that control. Even if everything were open source. This is because you don't h…

  3. comment
    Comment #49251941

    > The Kimi K3 'weights' are an opaque blob that can only be used by contract. No they are not. You can just ignore the contract. Unless you are a multi-billion dollar company, nobo…

  4. comment
    Comment #49130120

    > people are fearful that the entirety of the internet has been hoovered up Information wants to be free. If you don't like the idea of information, ideas, ect being shared freely …

  5. comment
    Comment #49130104

    No, being a cyberpunk is not about having some authoritarian control that prevents other people from using technology. Instead it is about empowering the masses. It's about being a…

  6. comment
    Comment #49079103

    Actually yes they are. Code has been determined to be protected speech.

  7. comment
    Comment #49053082

    You have misunderstood my statement. I am saying that someone else would use that output to create or improve a different model. I think you could have figured out that this was th…

  8. comment
    Comment #49048902

    > I suppose you think that model providers are not allowed to impose restrictions on the use of their model They should have exactly the same ability to "restrict" it is as the wri…

  9. comment
    Comment #49029821

    > But what will they claim? Copyright infringement obviously. > DOES NOT make a derivative for the purposes of copyright Or maybe you have misunderstood the ruling and thats why th…

  10. comment
    Comment #49029733

    Ok, but only if you also conceed that all of these AI companies were stealing to train their models in the first place. Either everyone was stealing all along, and they should all …

  11. comment
    Comment #48951821

    If your definition of VC is "Literally anything that requires a long term investment of money" then sure, but I think most people mean something different than that.

  12. comment
    Comment #48943002

    What do you mean, I thought it was fun. Feel free to not make your own music videos, but I am not sure why you would be so upset about other people having fun.

  13. comment
    Comment #48801571

    I'm surprised that the Author has missed a very important corollary to the diffusion of "genius theft" that they are bringing up. And that is the diffusion of the beneficiaries. Ma…

  14. comment
    Comment #48769518

    The people saying that jobs will all go away because of technology have been wrong every single year, up to this year as well. The burden of proof seems like it's actually on you t…

  15. comment
    Comment #48755495

    Seeing as we are talking about it now, it seems like they were right that it is interesting to the public. I am not sure why you think social media attention needs to be gate kept.…

  16. comment
    Comment #48755477

    Journalists are meant to report on the news. This sounds like an interesting piece of science/news to me.

  17. comment
    Comment #48741832

    Counter protesting people who are destroying a community seems like a perfectly laudable goal to me. He certainly wasn't expecting to have to shoot someone, but that's the case for…

  18. comment
    Comment #48741777

    No it's not unintuitive. Just like I can learn from a book and nobody can make that illegal, so can other people transformative do the same with computers. Fair use is fair use.

  19. comment
    Comment #48741762

    > So, why all this "effort" to protect the model? Because it's their model and business and they are free to use the free market to do exactly that? That's their free market rights…

  20. comment
    Comment #48728807

    If it was illegal to go somewhere "lookin for trouble" I think that you would see a whole lot of people arrested from certain groups that you likely wouldn't want to be in prison.

  21. comment
    Comment #48676455

    Almost nobody is covered by non compete agreements. And if you think you are, you should just ignore it anyway. They are often both illegal and unenforced. Your old employer isn't …

  22. comment
    Comment #48512461

    Well it would be anyone that has access to a datacenter to run them. Which is a ton of companies. And those companies will rent out access to those models. And if they do something…

  23. comment
    Comment #48470998

    I am sorry to be the one to tell you but it was already the case that you cannot trust LLMs to solve all your problems 100% of the time. It was always random. This is no different …

  24. comment
    Comment #48470986

    Of course you can trust them. Just do benchmarks yourself on the new model and decide if it is valuable for your usecase, even with the supposed nerfing. Benchmarks are benchmarks.…

  25. comment
    Comment #48468238

    They are actually designated as a terrorist organization by a very large number of countries. Almost every country in that region does, and around the world. Also, they do all sort…