Viewing profile — st0neage
st0neage
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Nov 11, 2013, 11:07 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 45
- Public activity
- 37 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About st0neage
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #7390469
Even if this holds up to scrutiny H1N1 will still be A LOT more dangerous than the vaccination.
-
comment
Comment #7176629
Google's app store is NOT comparable to "just any other store" because it is a quasi monopoly, which was my point in the first place. Therefore different rules (should) apply. How …
-
comment
Comment #7176611
Well... if walmart was by vast majority the only store present in any town and the vast majority of people are only able to shop there, it would of course be a problem too and woul…
-
comment
Comment #7176601
"[...] is why you end up with legislation written by lobbyists" no, it is not. Stating "uh the details of this are complicated, lets not do this" gets us nowhere. Following that lo…
-
comment
Comment #7173192
Nitpicking about details is not an argument.
-
comment
Comment #7173148
Extra app stores are the answer to everything? Wow ;) I never said that gov. regulation is the answer to everything. But in this case it is. That the US gov might act wrong in this…
-
comment
Comment #7173127
>>No, it's not irrelevant. Yes it is. >> It's only illegal [...] It is illegal to abuse the monopoly position. Which IS what google is doing. Googles app store is NOT just another …
-
comment
Comment #7170830
>>far from having a monopoly on App Stores Google has a (quasi-) monopoly on android app stores. Overall marketshare of android is irrelevant.
-
comment
Comment #7170397
>> "google play is preinstalled" on the majority of devices. my point still stands.
-
comment
Comment #7170163
>> They aren't and they don't. They are a store like any other and the store owner can decide not to sell your products without a good reason if they want to. On Android there are …
-
comment
Comment #7169929
Official app stores are quasi-monopolies and need government control. Think about all the time and work the developer has invested. And can't be possible for google to effectively …
-
comment
Comment #7120216
Don't. The (programming) world isn't perfect and trying to protect him from anything "confusing" or bad will not help him in the long run. Instead, explain. If you don't have a goo…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #7021016
And you are citing this as an example of how to do it right? Why?
-
comment
Comment #6887268
I fail to see the legitimate reason software assisted weapons or mass surveillance tech have to exist. Enlighten me? See my other reply below for your relativation fallacy.
-
comment
Comment #6887260
>where you draw the line I don't see this as a problem. The goal is to discuss and voice a common moral standard for CS. The idea worked well for doctors.
-
comment
Comment #6887253
Define assault. Is nudging someone to get their attention ok? How about hitting them in the face full force? Both are touching... See, the thing is, common sense helps with this. T…
-
comment
Comment #6887225
Maybe it was done deliberately?
-
comment
Comment #6886681
I like the idea of an oath like this and also thought about creating something a bit similar. Maybe you could call it a "Hippocratic Oath of Computer Science". I think it should be…
-
comment
Comment #6804956
You could just add protein powder?
-
comment
Comment #6804359
Ah there's what i was missing. Thanks!
-
comment
Comment #6804269
Not bashing, I actually want to know: How did a terminal emulator get blown up to 250MB?
-
comment
Comment #6780954
Actually that was meant to be a joke. Is that really a reason to downvote?
-
comment
Comment #6780201
Hell? This could be heaven! For everyone.
-
comment
Comment #6777357
Thank you for the link! :)