Viewing profile — spekcular
spekcular
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jan 31, 2020, 11:32 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 5,792
- Public activity
- 741 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About spekcular
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #38796330
Is the "optimal Julia workflow" written down anywhere?
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #37013753
You may be interested to know that this exact objection has been made in the philosophical literature. See "Causal Fundamentalism in Physics" by Zinkernagel (2010). Available here:…
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #36883283
The author is a professor at Ohio State University, specializing in condensed matter theory. His CV list two works on superconductors and a dissertation on supercapacitors.
-
comment
Comment #35857546
There's also a C-R bound for the biased case.
-
comment
Comment #35519763
But here the issue is the uncorrected multiple testing and under-reporting of results, not the p-values themselves. Any criterion for judging the presence of an effect is going to …
-
comment
Comment #35517481
AIC is an estimate of prediction error. I would caution against using it for selecting a model for the purpose of inference of e.g. population parameters from some dataset (without…
-
comment
Comment #35516661
How else do you propose to construct procedures that control type I error and evaluate their properties?
-
comment
Comment #35515296
I don't understand. CIs are equivalent to computing a bunch of p-values, by test-interval duality. Should I interpret your points as critiques of simple analyses that only test a s…
-
comment
Comment #35515127
The items you listed are certainly problems, but p-values don't have much to do with them, as far as I can see. Poor power is an experimental design problem, not a problem with the…
-
comment
Comment #35515030
I think if hypothesis testing is understood properly, these objections don't have much teeth. 1. Typically we use p-values to construct confidence intervals, answering the concern …
-
comment
Comment #35246803
Is there a modern reference you would recommend?
-
comment
Comment #34939689
My argument is that key claims of the paper are factually incorrect. For example, there was no "confession" by Karplus and Kroll. (At least, none is cited as far as I see - please …
-
comment
Comment #34874993
If a mathematical technique helps understand and predict nature, why not use it? The quote criticizing the method misunderstands it. It's certainly not "wrong" or "absurd." I disli…