Viewing profile — socketnaut
socketnaut
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Sep 08, 2017, 4:05 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 53
- Public activity
- 20 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About socketnaut
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49222047
Someone less cynical might recognize prioritization of technological advancement over video games as a good thing.
-
comment
Comment #23442868
Had to triple check that this wasn't satire after reading the first two points. Focusing on familiarity with buzzwords and trendy tools is exactly the wrong thing to do.
-
comment
Comment #23185835
I see, so you're saying the expected profit on the trade is $0 assuming an efficient market and ignoring trading costs? Your comment is confusing the way it's worded because the ex…
-
comment
Comment #23184473
When you say "expected value" are you trying to say most likely value?
-
comment
Comment #23184427
You can reliably lose money in absence of commissions by buying at the ask and selling at the bid. You can't invert that to make money.
-
comment
Comment #23106375
Because most people search fares online and book the cheapest ticket.
-
comment
Comment #23084516
Framing it as a loan seems like a good way to get funds out as quickly as possible while making it easier to get back anything that's misused.
-
comment
Comment #23070441
It’s not a statement about fairness: it’s a statement about filtering / sampling bias.
-
comment
Comment #22823235
“actualllllyyyyy” he’s saying something different. If you take a 0.3% chance for N days where N is large, you’ll land it 0.003N times, or once every ~333 days. The chance of landin…
-
comment
Comment #22721374
Depends on your field. If you're studying mathematics or computer science, learning happens mostly through deep work in isolation and there's enough material out there (books, pape…
-
comment
Comment #22656272
You need to be smarter than volume-weighted average, not smarter than the average participant. The demographic you have in mind is trading relatively small amounts of capital.
-
comment
Comment #21478473
Calculating opportunity cost for time spent based on wages is pretty meaningless for salaried jobs. I might make $X/hr at my day job, but I don't actually have the ability to work …
-
comment
Comment #19268465
The statistical claims in the article make the assumption that tweets are being sampled uniformly at random, which is most likely false. The fact that 3 machines handle 20% of twee…
-
comment
Comment #19227973
Which mountain was it?
-
comment
Comment #18707825
This just seems like survivorship bias. An algorithm / tool / technology tends not to remain in use if something that is both more elegant and more efficient is available. Therefor…
-
comment
Comment #18212859
It's not that simple because taxes modify gains but not losses. Imagine we bet $1 on a coin toss. The expected value for either of us is $0. Now imagine the winner is required to p…
-
comment
Comment #18016454
You might be more comfortable with Python syntax than with standard mathematical syntax, but I wouldn't think of it as being closer to "just a logical description" or closer to bei…
-
comment
Comment #17835543
I’m all for frugality. But you wouldn’t pay $2 for the freedom to use those 45 minutes in some other way?
-
comment
Comment #17775924
You're applying the "one-third rule" to pre-tax salary, but it's generally applied to take-home pay.
-
comment
Comment #16944331
If you spend that much on Amazon you should look into their 5% back credit card. There is an inherent "annual fee" in that it requires a prime membership, but you spent enough that…