Viewing profile — searchmartin

In your example they still show results, in mine, they do not.

Hands up... yes, it’s fully intended to get you to click through. (I wrote it) BUT: the underlying point is still valid, these are not sear results, that come from a search engine.…

There’s a screenshot example. More have been found since I wrote that piece. Best regards, “SEO scoundrel”

Well, I run that site. It’s non commercial, doesn’t have ads, and my clients are all Fortune 50’s. Do some research before trying to put people down, it’s unbecoming.

There must be some platform issue is my best guess...

Here's a write up as to why they have made the changes. Was going to write it yesterday, but life got in the way: http://webmarketingschool.com/no-twitter-did-not-just-de-ind...

again, no, they blocked it on WWW. only: http://webmarketingschool.com/no-twitter-did-not-just-de-ind...

Nope. No. They didn't. What they did was some perfectly legitimate duplicate content protection. Will write it up in a bit more detail...

I'd agree with that - on the press flaming that Apple are getting though - Im just not buying it. Really feels more like a cloud storage hack than iCloud, right?

I'd welcome the YCOM analysis of whats actually happened here, but iCloud just doesnt feel like the issue...

Yeah - agreed, Im not really against his position in as much that I realise he's stuck. If he did say "yeah, its possible, and it might screw your business up" then Google would ha…

search google for mattcutts.com - you'll see another post of mine from last year, detailing some theory ;)

errrr- weird, works for me in the US - Ive just opened up the privacy restrictions on it though - try again? thanks for letting me know btw!

watch the video in the post, its only 30 seconds long. The question was "does negative SEO exist", listen to the response. :)

Last week Matt Cutts said at SMX advanced that negative SEO wasnt a thing. Rand Fishkin asked for evidence it does. Well....... hows this?

Thats absolutely true - Google do have the power, and often use it, to make human decisions on the quality of websites and often ban those that break they TOS. As for whether Googl…

Proof Im leaving? Check the date on this post on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mogmartin/posts/10151730878862337 As for pinning blame on the author? Hardly... Im not debating …

Because I turned down the offer and gave him advice before he published his story. I took the decision then not to out the behaviour - however given that Im targeted in the article…

I totally agree there should be one set of rules and thats it. Thing is, there IS one set of rules already - and thats governed by the google organic results algo which looks at a …

Which is in no way relevant to me, other than I worked for a different division of the same company. The only reason I got mentioned, was that I refused to pay money to not have it…