Viewing profile — screwycaboose

Is it anti-competitive? Apple literally told them how they could reapply the app in a way where they would owe Apple $0. Which again, Basecamp already does. They know this is how i…

Recently enough that they happened to be working on Hey at the same time.

Last year in front of Congress (while actively developing this new product). They never mentioned it despite Basecamp being in the app store for years and paying Apple $0. The "oh …

Because it's not a monopoly. Apple is roughly half of the marketshare in the US, and dramatically lower than that worldwide. They're also not saying that Hey can't be in their stor…

Probably could be a lot less than $43/mo if Basecamp didn't feel the need to spend 7 figures on a domain. They're not filling some massive need; it's yet another email service. If …

Seems like a lot of these examples are intentionally ignoring the rules that allow them as exceptions just to build up a bigger strawman: * Netflix: Reader app (reader is a special…

it's only 30% of the first year if you allow subscriptions in app, then 15% the following years

There is a difference. Subscriptions only pay 30% of the first year. Every year after drops to 15%.