Viewing profile — salad-fan
salad-fan
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Nov 04, 2022, 3:40 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 105
- Public activity
- 84 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About salad-fan
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #34114440
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #34100201
Nice straw man you’ve propped up there, but it’s not mine and I have no interest in defending it. I hope Sky Daddy rewards you for defending his gang of pedophiles.
-
comment
Comment #34100192
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #34096229
Dude has Dunning-Kruger’ed himself into a corner.
-
comment
Comment #34096060
No you. You’re the ones defending child molesters, after all.
-
comment
Comment #34096049
Oh I’m sorry I thought we were having a grown up conversation. Have a nice day.
-
comment
Comment #34093355
You not only misread what they wrote, you misread what I wrote. I wasn’t saying the original commenter was “guilty by association”, I was pushing back on their “anti-wokenes” nonse…
-
comment
Comment #34093320
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #34093287
That proves nothing - Catholic schools are still schools, after all. The point is that the Catholic Church has a systemic child abuse problem that includes, but extends beyond, its…
-
comment
Comment #34090247
> I'm making the point the public system has a worse record on the subject. Source? > The second [teacher / student relationships] is at times encouraged by popular culture when th…
-
comment
Comment #34090211
The commenter went beyond curriculum with this part of their comment (which has since been edited to remove the word “woke”, I might add): > All of the politics and social justice,…
-
comment
Comment #34090055
Not at all. Catholic schools are not even remotely independent of the church despite what you seem to think, and therefore share the same systemic problems.
-
comment
Comment #34089708
What makes you think Catholic school kids don’t have parents or other relatives? And are you trying to argue that the Catholic Church does not have a history of child molestation? …
-
comment
Comment #34089560
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #34082075
Two hilariously terrible takes in the span of 10 minutes. Keep going - this is just the entertainment I was looking for.
-
comment
Comment #34056660
What he needs is professional help.
-
comment
Comment #34048453
It’s not doxxing because aircraft locations are a matter of public record. A newspaper or other publication publishing information that’s already public is not a net new disclosure…
-
comment
Comment #34044496
Username checks out there Elno, but we see through it.
-
comment
Comment #34037718
Yuck no thanks.
-
comment
Comment #34037709
Of course he is, just like he doesn’t have to worry about the First Amendment. But again that’s not the point. I can only explain this to you; I can’t understand it for you.
-
comment
Comment #34035499
Sure but that’s not the point. Phony Stark acquired Twitter because he had concerns about erosion of free speech on the platform, and yet he is doing (and has done) more to erode f…
-
comment
Comment #34035484
Yes but the articles in question didn’t violate the quoted law. Sharing public information (the location of Phony Stark’s jet) is not doxxing.
-
comment
Comment #34024381
It’s because these journalists wrote articles that were critical of Musk. Not to mention that the publications where these articles were published have vastly stronger rules about …
-
comment
Comment #34008802
Phony Stark has lost it.
-
comment
Comment #34008653
Except that unlike VR headsets, Mastodon is a viable replacement for Twitter.