Viewing profile — sBqQu3U0wH
sBqQu3U0wH
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Oct 12, 2022, 12:53 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 295
- Public activity
- 105 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sBqQu3U0wH
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42748108
Finally. I am not fond of code-to-diagram tools and wanted to try Mermaid, as it seems like one of the better diagramming tools around. Will definitely give it a try now.
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #41359612
>However, after the war started, I lost all interest in reading anything Russian. I know it's irrational, but these lost their luster instantly. Many share the same sentiment, and …
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #41238298
Never in my life have I been interested in any sponsor mentioned in a YouTube video. It's sad to see creators having to include these humiliation rituals in their videos just to ke…
-
comment
Comment #41071148
>but it never does Depends on a producer, I guess. Where I'm from, same amount of decaffeinated coffee by the same producer is around 42% more expensive.
-
comment
Comment #40802983
Cool, the performance is significantly better than the previous time. Or is it a different kind of simulation?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #39535418
This seems like a meaningless trivialization, because you completely remove the meaning and purpose of the thing. All the code you write gets converted into machine code. Why not w…
-
comment
Comment #39517648
I have a similar opinion. What puts me off about the language is it's horrendously ugly syntax and toxic, cult-like community (maybe these types are a minority, but they are awfull…
-
comment
Comment #39385112
>which is not the default state on any OS Irrelevant. It could be intentionally or accidentally disabled by the user. I don't know why you are so annoyed, but I know for a fact tha…
-
comment
Comment #39380653
>Bluetooth file transfer is not accessible enough for non-technical people? It's incredibly difficult. Do you have any idea how "non-technical" these "non-technical" people are? I …
-
comment
Comment #39330779
I don't consider anyone "less" for having any kind of medical intervention. If it required a pacemaker, I would agree without a second though, absolutely.
-
comment
Comment #39239088
>Is the use of eyeglasses or hearing aids "fake" too? Yes. >Or do you have some kind of fear of contamination, being "less-than-human"? No. In fact, I have nothing against external…
-
comment
Comment #39239072
That's not what I had in mind. Whatever.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #39227335
Yes, but they are biological with which I was born with and not a manufactured chunk of metal with circuits.
-
comment
Comment #39227327
What I meant is "being kept alive by artificial means". You can live without having a functioning hand - you can't without a functioning heart. But, to some extent yes, if it's som…
-
comment
Comment #39223656
Because I think that it's not a life worth living, because living like this would feel fake, artificial. I don't want it to depend entirely on some device with battery. Moreover, i…
-
comment
Comment #39223060
Yeah, memento mori. Not entirely related, but I was diagnosed with a complete AV block over a year ago, but refused pacemaker implantation. Just reminds me that if even semingly he…
-
comment
Comment #39222677
Haha, I got "Trojan Cannonball", and it was marked as "First discovery.". Although it's not that rare, you can create hilarious combinations.
-
comment
Comment #39192956
>celibate which is even harder and much more uncommon. How is it hard? You don't have to do anything. Being the opposite is hard.
-
comment
Comment #38991930
There is no source because it's not true. People pretend they are horrified more than they really are because it's more "normal" and socially acceptable. They think more about what…