Viewing profile — s279

The data might be from an old breach, but the data are also unlikely to change very often, so is more than likely current for a large proportion of those who have been exposed (pho…

You weren’t kidding that they weren’t kidding, I almost vomited. Some less harsh criticism: - zigzag circle looks like a visual field migraine before the spinning, cut both replace…

Their news reporting isn't that bad, but what is bad is the mixing of a large number of editorial pieces that do still wave a neoliberalist flag. I encourage having a look at https…

I understand, but disagree. They didn’t need to violate the contract for creation of a lawsuit. Hell, they could have terminated their agreement and try to contract with apple with…

That’s Apple’s prerogative after banning a developer who has violated their contract with them. Otherwise you could have shady developers just create numerous of legal entities to …

Agreed!

Why should a court intervene in the contracting of two private parties? Epic started this fight by intentionally breaching an existing contract with Apple, only so they can get bet…

As someone who used to practice law, I find it frustrating that there was no apparent objection to the questioning. Really while it may be "simple arithmetic" often expert witnesse…

Would a company making an assertion that it wasn't being snooped on before they were actually snooped be guilty of fraud after the fact has changed? Given they can't say they are n…