Viewing profile — ryanschaefer
ryanschaefer
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jun 16, 2023, 8:45 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 180
- Public activity
- 106 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ryanschaefer
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49114337
Not showing the actual query is somewhat disappointing
-
comment
Comment #49047258
What?
-
comment
Comment #48967939
Are you the author of this page?
-
comment
Comment #48947799
The market *hates* this one weird trick to juice earnings
-
comment
Comment #48866064
This was a satirical comment about this: https://x.com/trq212/status/2014051501786931427
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48817828
Guess I have to throw it in here… “/s” on my original comment
-
comment
Comment #48817634
Please be respectful. I find it incredibly dismissive that you would use such language to describe such amazing individuals. They revolutionized the industry. They built a game eng…
-
comment
Comment #48816625
> I had written a whole pull request by hand, and then Adam rejected it. But he said, “Actually, you should use clide for this.” Interesting
-
comment
Comment #48759188
Had a similar comment but what’s even weirder and I seemed to have missed entirely at first glance is that this is an AI news aggregator agent? The article is “by MLQ Agent.”
-
comment
Comment #48759164
I mean… should you be able to? It looks like this is just an AI summarizing a bunch of other paywalled sources. It’s “by MLQ Agent”
-
comment
Comment #48755630
What makes you assert that?
-
comment
Comment #48755408
It’s funny how many times the same thing happens at each large company. I think people’s thought process is this: > Oh wow! If I paid for this myself I would have spent a lot of mo…
-
comment
Comment #48755384
Wasn’t this already reported on? FWIW this article links to primary sources from early last month https://www.theinformation.com/articles/tokenminimizing-meta...
-
comment
Comment #48520257
If Michael Lewis is to be believed making Gemini whole was his largest mistake.
-
comment
Comment #48519617
> According to a Wall Street Journal (WSJ) report, the technique in question was tested by researchers at Amazon, Why not link that? Is this a dupe? Found the primary source: https…
-
comment
Comment #48518056
> Members can request a division of the assembly (a rising vote, where each sides rise in turn to be counted) Isn’t this the important bit? IIRC this can be demanded by anyone. If …
-
comment
Comment #48387579
“First time” The graph seems like it only goes back to April 27 and on that day it was 57% bot…
-
comment
Comment #48258526
A strange issue I’ve found is careless use of AI at my job has lead to many people rolling their own incomplete mini parsers. Think YAML parsers of a frontmatter that expects eithe…
-
comment
Comment #48257445
The problem is using AI to “push” the answer to an asker. Unless the company has hidden docs they use for support (which why would that ever benefit them), I could get just as good…
-
comment
Comment #48221950
It’s the fat introduced by the process that annoys me the most. The user of the LLM had an idea, but it got greased up and packaged into something that the average person would cre…
-
comment
Comment #48221921
The oversized emdashes are chefs kiss
-
comment
Comment #48221345
Entirely accurate, but what an absolute waste of resources across the board.
-
comment
Comment #48147775
In really large codebases grep and find timeout. If you operate at that scale you quickly come to realize Claude will not use the tools you built to make searching feasible.
-
comment
Comment #48140262
It’s a watershed moment. Basically one of the most controlled applications of an LLM into a robust codebase without regard for the implications of doing so. Anthropic needed someth…