Viewing profile — rurban
rurban
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Sep 13, 2011, 10:06 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 7,321
- Public activity
- 8,352 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About rurban
meet.hn/city/51.0493286,13.7381437/Dresden
Socials: - bsky.app/profile/rurban - github.com/rurban ---
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49219746
More probably worst use of NixOS. In embedded we care for every single kb, and don't have tolerance for this kind of space waste management system
-
comment
Comment #49219650
62s for a single instruction! Wonder if an compilers cost tables knows that. But it's data dependent, and cost functions probably don't do that.
-
comment
Comment #49219602
I had to write a gnome shell extension to see my various LLM token budgets. Green, orange, red for Claude, OpenAI, GitHub Business, Kimi, DeepSeek, and such. Very useful.
-
comment
Comment #49219584
I had similar problems with my free movie festival ratings database, so eventually I had to get rid of the dynamic lookup, and I only dump now static sites, hosted on GitHub Pages.…
-
comment
Comment #49206414
This was the first time for me. All tests failed, for the whole day. For 20m, ok, I can tolerate that. But for a whole day? Microsoft sucks big time.
-
comment
Comment #49173727
I'd really need to marry this with qemu and osxcross, the ability to cross compile from x86_64-linux to darwin. So far I could only test apple compilation, but not runtime yet.
-
comment
Comment #49173571
Thanks for the depth-anything.cpp port. Saves us a couple of kernel OOM's, causing connection disruptions.
-
comment
Comment #49173480
USA above average? That cannot be true
-
comment
Comment #49151897
In gdb? It's a shame gdb picked python
-
comment
Comment #49146693
Certainly not. Every hand-optimized tight loop or lookup beats every compiler still. Compilers are extremely stupid, and esp. the language designers.
-
comment
Comment #49146638
Because the Intel syntax is limited, and pretty broken by binutils. I had to change my C compiler rcc to emit AT&T GAS, instead of Intel syntax, even if Intel syntax looks easier o…
-
comment
Comment #49144321
Well, the middle ages. Thanks we got around this mess
- story
-
comment
Comment #49126013
Not really fine tuned. But the base was Qwen. We are analyzing images
-
comment
Comment #49122663
For LLM inference in production we use vLLM (with our own model).
-
comment
Comment #49120547
Did they train on sama? Highly unlikely
-
comment
Comment #49120527
Happy with oh-my-pi (omp)
-
comment
Comment #49112136
No openmp, no openacc, though that would all be trivial. For linking, my own linker still has a lot of regressions, but is at least 10x faster than shelling out to gcc/ld. Similar …
-
comment
Comment #49112003
No way. No open prompts. But I use omp /collab, so I prompt it from my phone. Constantly
-
comment
Comment #49111235
It compiles the kernel and my big projects, but I haven't released it yet. Feature wise I don't do bitint, decimal and FloatX. No auto-vectorization, but better than most simd/neon…
-
comment
Comment #49110314
Of course not. I don't care for gcc's broken optimizer to remove dead code without any warning. gcc has too many bugs for my taste, sorry. And I don't want to wait 20m on gcc compi…
-
comment
Comment #49110280
The proof is gcc's torture test suite. Have a look
-
comment
Comment #49109775
I had to reverse engineer Chinese SDK's for various embedded chips. Their libs were full of this shit. It works in some cases, but rarely in all. In embedded you can thankfully thr…
-
comment
Comment #49109654
If you manage to click through all >200 partners to say no, the TV startup will be significantly faster. Like 10x faster. Cutting them off the wire and view through another dongle …
-
comment
Comment #49109574
You've seen Australia. Every kid who wanted had access to forbidden social media. The control bit is the dangerous one, sure.