Viewing profile — roflmaostc
roflmaostc
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Mar 24, 2021, 1:08 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 418
- Public activity
- 157 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About roflmaostc
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49198328
Reading this article, now I can understand why there is jokes about Jeff Dean's binary readability...
-
comment
Comment #49190447
Google already invested into them.
-
comment
Comment #49161120
is there actually any source those attacks are really done by "script kiddies"? More likely this more politically motivated and backed up by money and more capable groups
-
comment
Comment #49116664
"We’re putting our frontier models and tools in the hands of 100,000 scientists, mathematicians, and engineers—at no cost."
- story
-
comment
Comment #48727176
Your linked preprint has been also published in Nature Communications: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms3401
-
comment
Comment #48676999
yeah, where on the pictures is the 0.7nm feature? The linespacing is around 5nm. Is it the white line which is 0.7nm?
-
comment
Comment #48676911
I found once super old books in our lab (like hundreds of years) and was wondering what they were used for. Apparently they did CT scans of closed books and read the content. Polev…
-
comment
Comment #48179550
I am fully aware of the costs and so on. But i can certainly imagine that LLMs help with the process of understanding and editing old code. And of course you need to test and debug…
-
comment
Comment #48178622
Many of the issues could potentially be solved by modern LLMs? Reading, analyzing and assembling documentation could be probably done by LLMs. And by including old code and snippet…
-
comment
Comment #47536067
Good initiative! The problem is: publication is based on reputation. Reputation takes time and effort from the entire community. I feel like modern infrastructure (Google Scholar, …
-
comment
Comment #47516089
Partially agree. However, this problem has existed with scam e-mails since the 90s. For me the solution is in signed e-mails and signed documents. If the person invites me to a onl…
-
comment
Comment #47119993
It doesn't surprise me it happens within the Elsevier ecosystem. Elsevier has a long tradition of scientific misconduct and scientifically immoral behavior (see Wikipedia). The ope…
-
comment
Comment #47060006
I remember recent discussions on the somewhat rudimentary physical server infrastructure. I would be a bit scared for a serious large project https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4…
-
comment
Comment #46796020
I am not so skeptical about AI usage for paper writing as the paper will be often public days after anyways (pre-print servers such as arXiv). So yes, you use it to write the paper…
-
comment
Comment #46615005
lol, at 0:15 someone is literally testing the vapes with their mouth. I hope they don't do that all day long Later at 6:45 they show more people testing them
-
comment
Comment #46556123
Isn't that what happens in Europe with most rooted phones and banks too? At least I can remember my banking apps stopped working.
-
comment
Comment #46540129
Beef (red meat) is classified as a probable carcinogen, while chicken (white meat) is safe according to current research.
-
comment
Comment #46540109
Have fun eating 2kg of broccoli to get 50g of protein.
-
comment
Comment #46444565
there's also lots of water to wash then. The problem is the same, the relative concentration of oxygen in air is less than 0.05% (~450pars per million). In water much less.
-
comment
Comment #46444395
The problem is you cannot plant enough trees around the globe to offset our CO2 emissions. Also, a forest only absorbs CO2 while alive. Once it dies, it emits CO2 too. You would ne…
-
comment
Comment #46444365
try to calculate 12312312.123213 * 123123.3123123 A computer uses orders of magnitude less energy than a human. It's all about the task, humans are specialized too. EDIT: maybe add…
-
comment
Comment #46288936
Why? Can you share any examples?
-
comment
Comment #46274014
Whenever I read about Xerox, it reminds me of the story that their scanners would randomly change numbers on prints https://dkriesel.com/en/blog/2013/0802_xerox-workcentres_are...
-
comment
Comment #46243520
Haha, check who updated this article. Only afterwards I realized we're not past the 14th yet...