Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — roflmaostc

roflmaostc

HN member
Joined
Wed, Mar 24, 2021, 1:08 PM UTC
HN karma
418
Public activity
157 items

About roflmaostc

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49198328

    Reading this article, now I can understand why there is jokes about Jeff Dean's binary readability...

  2. comment
    Comment #49190447

    Google already invested into them.

  3. comment
    Comment #49161120

    is there actually any source those attacks are really done by "script kiddies"? More likely this more politically motivated and backed up by money and more capable groups

  4. comment
    Comment #49116664

    "We’re putting our frontier models and tools in the hands of 100,000 scientists, mathematicians, and engineers—at no cost."

  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #48727176

    Your linked preprint has been also published in Nature Communications: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms3401

  7. comment
    Comment #48676999

    yeah, where on the pictures is the 0.7nm feature? The linespacing is around 5nm. Is it the white line which is 0.7nm?

  8. comment
    Comment #48676911

    I found once super old books in our lab (like hundreds of years) and was wondering what they were used for. Apparently they did CT scans of closed books and read the content. Polev…

  9. comment
    Comment #48179550

    I am fully aware of the costs and so on. But i can certainly imagine that LLMs help with the process of understanding and editing old code. And of course you need to test and debug…

  10. comment
    Comment #48178622

    Many of the issues could potentially be solved by modern LLMs? Reading, analyzing and assembling documentation could be probably done by LLMs. And by including old code and snippet…

  11. comment
    Comment #47536067

    Good initiative! The problem is: publication is based on reputation. Reputation takes time and effort from the entire community. I feel like modern infrastructure (Google Scholar, …

  12. comment
    Comment #47516089

    Partially agree. However, this problem has existed with scam e-mails since the 90s. For me the solution is in signed e-mails and signed documents. If the person invites me to a onl…

  13. comment
    Comment #47119993

    It doesn't surprise me it happens within the Elsevier ecosystem. Elsevier has a long tradition of scientific misconduct and scientifically immoral behavior (see Wikipedia). The ope…

  14. comment
    Comment #47060006

    I remember recent discussions on the somewhat rudimentary physical server infrastructure. I would be a bit scared for a serious large project https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4…

  15. comment
    Comment #46796020

    I am not so skeptical about AI usage for paper writing as the paper will be often public days after anyways (pre-print servers such as arXiv). So yes, you use it to write the paper…

  16. comment
    Comment #46615005

    lol, at 0:15 someone is literally testing the vapes with their mouth. I hope they don't do that all day long Later at 6:45 they show more people testing them

  17. comment
    Comment #46556123

    Isn't that what happens in Europe with most rooted phones and banks too? At least I can remember my banking apps stopped working.

  18. comment
    Comment #46540129

    Beef (red meat) is classified as a probable carcinogen, while chicken (white meat) is safe according to current research.

  19. comment
    Comment #46540109

    Have fun eating 2kg of broccoli to get 50g of protein.

  20. comment
    Comment #46444565

    there's also lots of water to wash then. The problem is the same, the relative concentration of oxygen in air is less than 0.05% (~450pars per million). In water much less.

  21. comment
    Comment #46444395

    The problem is you cannot plant enough trees around the globe to offset our CO2 emissions. Also, a forest only absorbs CO2 while alive. Once it dies, it emits CO2 too. You would ne…

  22. comment
    Comment #46444365

    try to calculate 12312312.123213 * 123123.3123123 A computer uses orders of magnitude less energy than a human. It's all about the task, humans are specialized too. EDIT: maybe add…

  23. comment
    Comment #46288936

    Why? Can you share any examples?

  24. comment
    Comment #46274014

    Whenever I read about Xerox, it reminds me of the story that their scanners would randomly change numbers on prints https://dkriesel.com/en/blog/2013/0802_xerox-workcentres_are...

  25. comment
    Comment #46243520

    Haha, check who updated this article. Only afterwards I realized we're not past the 14th yet...