Viewing profile — qpooqpoo
qpooqpoo
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 3:10 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 13
- Public activity
- 42 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About qpooqpoo
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #36463290
No, Kaczynski compiled his own writings. He also wrote a second book, Anti-Tech Revolution. In Kacynski's latest edition of Technological Slavery Skrbina's introduction doesn't eve…
-
comment
Comment #36403212
The book Technological Slavery is not "by" David Skrbina. It is by Theodore Kaczynski. Skrbina just wrote the "afterward" in that book.
-
comment
Comment #35192389
Anti-Tech Revolution and Technological Slavery are both amazing books and must-reads.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #33768830
His books are even better. "Anti-Tech Revolution" and "Technological Slavery".
-
comment
Comment #24404647
Agreed.
-
comment
Comment #23764471
Thank you for this discussion. Suffice it to say I think you are dead wrong here. But a debate on the points you now raise is beyond the time I have to devote now.
-
comment
Comment #23763929
"(a) humans behaved the way he needs them to behave for his system to work." This is flatly wrong. Humans aren't "needed" to behave in this system in any way other than they have a…
-
comment
Comment #23762984
You're still conflating the success of a tactic in furtherance of a goal with the success of a goal.
-
comment
Comment #23762951
"..the Unabomber gets remembered as this struggle's John Brown, not this struggle's Abraham Lincoln." You could be right about this. But then you could be wrong. Ideas still matter…
-
comment
Comment #23762801
On this point you would do well to read the third chapter of "Anti-Tech Revolution." In it, Kaczynski argues for why an anti-tech revolution as he lays out would succeed and why it…
-
comment
Comment #23762710
"You appear to be assuming the communist manifesto was a success due to the Russian Revolution." You've missed the point. The point is not that the communist manifesto was ultimate…
-
comment
Comment #23761073
Now, when looking at the short-term (historically speaking), Kaczynski's actions have been a resounding success. The manifesto and his other works are read by millions--far far mor…
-
comment
Comment #23760963
This only makes sense if you place a limited and arbitrary timeframe on when "success" must be achieved, and what the "success" should be. Remember, the communist manifesto was pub…
-
comment
Comment #23753537
"His approach was not successful, no." According to what criteria do you make this determination?
-
comment
Comment #23753527
"The tranquility he's describing would, I imagine, guide one to understand that you can't control other people's actions." This makes no sense.
-
comment
Comment #23753505
Also check out Kaczynski's books: "Technological Slavery" and "Anti-Tech Revolution."
-
comment
Comment #23753497
"...whether or not murder is acceptable..." Here you're begging the question. Murder is unjustified killing, and by calling something murder before you've even fully determined the…
-
comment
Comment #23752810
Check out "Anti-Tech Revolution." That's his second book.
-
comment
Comment #23082725
“There is an old saying in politics: ‘As soon as you start explaining, you have lost.’ It becomes incredibly difficult to counter misinformation with a point by point rebuttal—even…
-
comment
Comment #23082642
What are you worried about? A debate about facts on a controversial topic with someone who is interested in it? Why does everyone here seem so timid and silly? Is it really necessa…
-
comment
Comment #23082613
This constitutes the "proof" that Kaczynski was somehow lastingly affected by the study? A writers theory in a book? The problem with that is that I can just as well present eviden…
-
comment
Comment #23082554
"If anything's a conspiracy theory, it's that the entirety of your comment history on Hacker News, spanning 2 years is to post solely on the topic of the Unabomber, and that you do…
-
comment
Comment #23082547
Kaczynski has come out and said it wasn't stressful, and that it was mostly multiple choice questions. Other participants in the study and other researchers involved have come out …
-
comment
Comment #23073789
Yes, this is more or less correct. You should absolutely read Kaczynski's two books as well, "Technological Slavery" and "Anti-Tech Revolution."