Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — qnrq

qnrq

HN member
Joined
Mon, Nov 23, 2009, 6:13 AM UTC
HN karma
34
Public activity
26 items

About qnrq

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #12757984

    You can also route only read-only methods in urls.py, for example via: url( r'path/$', TheModelViewSetView.as_view({"get": "list"}), name="thename" ) or "retrieve" instead of "list…

  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #7693035

    Profit is wonderful, even more so if earned through other means than tracking users' Internet activity unknowingly. Most users of the Internet don't know that Google sees them in m…

  4. comment
    Comment #7692887

    Hi, OP here. >> We live under structured societies and under a specific set of rules we call LAW. We don't, you do. I packed my backpack and moved to the 3rd world at 22 and haven'…

  5. comment
  6. comment
    Comment #7551467

    works fine here https://web.archive.org/web/20140408044206/https://blog.ipre...

  7. story
  8. comment
    Comment #6179112

    So it's an excellent opportunity for up and coming designers to contribute to a promising open source project.

  9. story
  10. comment
    Comment #6006481

    "Didn't you just loose the security that you wanted by encrypting on localhost?" No, the sensitive information isn't being protected from localhost but from server A and anything e…

  11. comment
    Comment #6005927

    Check the links posted in the comment you replied to, it's not cryptography in JavaScript: it's JavaScript posting to a httpd on user's localhost which bridges GnuPG. It's not for …

  12. comment
    Comment #6005840

    The questions that you raise is of course what I am interested in discussing. I can't think of any way that PGP/GPG protects you against keyloggers or a pre-infected computer. I ag…

  13. comment
    Comment #6005741

    That's a valid point, but you won't be effectively encrypt incoming email in the layer of a webmail client. You'd be better off incorporating that before the message is even saved …

  14. comment
    Comment #6005420

    My plugin does nothing crypto based on the server side, everything is happening locally in the browser through JavaScript and in the future there will be an additional driver for p…

  15. comment
    Comment #6005387

    Hi, I'm glad I found your comment, I just pushed something like what you just described to one of my repos yesterday. Hear me out, I'm not self promoting myself out of context here…

  16. comment
    Comment #2987276

    reminds me of http://youtify.com/

  17. comment
    Comment #2002552

    I completely agree. We didn't install a cert since there were some doubts around wether we would sign it ourselves or not. Either what we decide, a self signed cert is better than …

  18. comment
  19. comment
  20. comment
  21. comment
  22. story
    Review my startup: Secure webmail service

    After two and a half years of work: Pipemail sees public light. Pipemail encrypts emails using aes256; but any symmetric-key encryption cipher works, really. It's built around the …

  23. comment
    Comment #1209808

    You can read about !image here: http://duckduckgo.com/bang.html

  24. story
  25. story