Viewing profile — pwdisswordfishs
pwdisswordfishs
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Oct 16, 2025, 10:11 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 128
- Public activity
- 79 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About pwdisswordfishs
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49159254
> Google signaled their wholesale abandonment of the Chromebook platform When?
-
comment
Comment #48839007
Open source it, you pussies
-
comment
Comment #48713895
> Bloated file sizes due to javascript libraries for lazy loading data. Use of JS, including the NPM-backed bloat you see in libraries used on the modern web, is orthogonal to whet…
-
comment
Comment #48697316
> There's plenty of people who occasionally need to create barcodes > hopefully that [1MB] will be served from a cache
-
comment
Comment #48685933
Aside from obfuscating the source code to sell licenses, how does this benefit from WASM? Barcodes have been generated for decades on low-resource embedded devices. Even what would…
-
comment
Comment #48580314
> I use change detection to monitor all sorts of websites for changes. Some of my favorite authors don't have RSS. Have you considered offering, as penitence, a public feed to shar…
-
comment
Comment #48549786
> it no longer works in every app because services insist on writing their own players that don't work as well as the player provided by Apple TV So much for those oft-touted benef…
-
comment
Comment #48544301
> it just is an overlay for pirate streaming sites Not "just". You left out its role as a bot network exit node.
-
comment
Comment #48526620
For server implementations that aren't braindead, that is indeed the important bit. Computers don't inherently know how to run PHP. If the request handler doesn't look at the file …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48269126
Honesty requires I note that I had badly mischaracterized my man, far more in his favor than anything of which he has proven deserving. On that note please excuse my use of a share…
-
comment
Comment #48259713
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48252566
> I find that most datepickers are better than the browser's You mean your browser's. There is no "the browser".
-
comment
Comment #48251641
> the code itself makes it harder for people to contribute, especially those, like me, who don't use coding agents. > Where are the interface boundaries? Why are there methods that…
-
comment
Comment #48250847
DHH, of course.
-
comment
Comment #48035118
> it feels like this is much more a UX/social problem It's not merely "like" that. That's what it is. "Wiki" comes from the Hawaiian work for "quick". You spot an error, you click …
-
comment
Comment #48031263
If the contributor instructions for your wiki requires: 1. forking the repo 2. committing the changes 3. submitting a pull request ... then you don't have a wiki.
-
comment
Comment #47941066
I've gotten those taps on the shoulder. Every time I went for it, I ended up thinking, "Geez. What was I expecting to be good about this? This experience is awful."
-
comment
Comment #47940399
> This wouldn't be an issue if patches were XML or JSON Or MIME, even.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #47921007
Solution: don't use mobile bank apps.
-
comment
Comment #47867014
"Trivial" doesn't exclusively mean "easy", though it is often used as a euphemism like that. In a literal sense, it very well may have been trivial, even if neither you nor the pro…
-
comment
Comment #47866537
Subjectively, it seems like it's even prudent to consider that someone who is involved in a discussion about whether or not they're suicidal is probably likelier than average to co…
-
comment
Comment #47866390
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47840370
Mozilla also isn't exactly strapped for cash. They pull in around half a billion dollars per year (to accomplish what could be done on a budget a tenth that size).