Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — pseudalopex

pseudalopex

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 12:46 AM UTC
HN karma
6,837
Public activity
4,678 items

About pseudalopex

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49217622

    > This is very obviously not the type of situation and behavior marginalia_nu and then I were commenting about. marginalia_nu said all news.

  2. comment
    Comment #49217548

    Your thoughts of this are black and white seemingly. People can doom scroll news and black pill circle jerk on social media. Or they can use them to learn things they can change an…

  3. comment
    Comment #49217297

    > I think this idea (and I necessarily don’t believe in it, but let’s give it a fair chance) is more like a few-weeks detox. > Rather than giving up on news entirely, in the long-r…

  4. comment
    Comment #49217180

    > As an experiment, completely stop consuming news and social media for a few weeks. The assumption I had not was false.

  5. comment
    Comment #49215941

    > Has the knowledge of the issues increased your agency in a meaningful way such that you've taken actions to improve things Yes.

  6. comment
    Comment #49215536

    Graeber's test of a bullshit job was it could be eliminated without harm to society. Jobs to make people above feel important was 1 type he identified.

  7. comment
    Comment #49215249

    You don't really ever see investment bankers reacting how?

  8. comment
    Comment #49215008

    > All the news is just outrage porn and non-stop predictions of impending doom. No. And this shallow dismissal builds the mood you complained about.

  9. comment
    Comment #49184770

    Strengths and weaknesses of different models are helpful to know. And the model could be important later for legal reasons.

  10. comment
    Comment #49184262

    Many people who complained of cancel culture called banishment or weaker action from 1 community cancel culture. Many more when 2 communities disciplined the same person independen…

  11. story
  12. comment
    Comment #49169403

    Someone who needed work listed a skill in their CV which many employers demand. Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that…

  13. comment
    Comment #49159244

    A dead comment said It's previous recipients synced over iCloud. And said how to see this.[1] Vouch it if you can. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49158388

  14. comment
    Comment #49129823

    > A high-profile clinical trial of drugs that can delay puberty in children questioning their gender can go ahead after the High Court rejected a legal challenge by campaigners. Th…

  15. comment
    Comment #49128774

    > No, that is not the purpose of "puberty blockers." The context was gender dysphoria treatment. Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not …

  16. comment
    Comment #49128375

    Most developed countries allow minors to make medical decisions from an age or if enough mature. Puberty blockers are reversible generally. Suicide is not. Many people believe adul…

  17. comment
    Comment #49128253

    Gender dysphoria is mental by definition.

  18. comment
    Comment #49128111

    > I don't consider it gatekeeping, rather prevention of making an irreversible choice while the frontal lobe is still far from knowing even what path it wants for itself for the re…

  19. comment
    Comment #49127712

    Most developed countries allow minors to make medical decisions from an age or if enough mature.

  20. comment
    Comment #49127385

    They meant trans people should be allowed hormone replacement therapy before legal adulthood seemingly.

  21. comment
    Comment #49127096

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49126491

  22. comment
    Comment #49127073

    > This is equally true when you don't intervene. The effects of puberty blockers can be reversed much more than the effects of puberty.

  23. comment
    Comment #49126916

    Some people opposed removal of ugly structures because they had other significance does not prove no people opposed construction of ugly structures because they were ugly.

  24. comment
    Comment #49126857

    The article required a subscription. And archives did not have it.

  25. comment
    Comment #49126672

    > I’ve sat through enough city public hearings to know what the author claims isn’t true. > People don’t care if the building is gorgeous; they will still oppose it simply because …