Viewing profile — pjwal
pjwal
HN member- Joined
- Mon, May 12, 2014, 10:11 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 42
- Public activity
- 43 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About pjwal
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #37787912
Pages 28+. Your accountant probably hasn't grokked it yet. If they have, please send me your referral.
- story
-
story
Ask HN: Disabled 1099 Employee
We have a software engineer just out of college that is adding value. He is a 1099 empoloyee right now and has told us he cannot work more than 20 hours because of his condition. A…
-
comment
Comment #14833568
Quite simply, if you have the ability to look at code you wrote recently and ask yourself, "what the hell was I thinking?"
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #14675809
Let's use this opportunity to clean out the stink. Including the fact that https://www.linkedin.com/in/jsmarr/ made Friendster (somewhat) popular by taking users registrations to h…
-
comment
Comment #14608644
Can someone explain to me this dichotomy I see with the almost thermo-nuclear war when it comes to copyright protection of total drivel, but when it comes to fin-tech there is lite…
-
comment
Comment #14306492
This is the approach I take. The subject should always be queried, so just use a field on that subject for the purpose of killing current sessions.
-
comment
Comment #13759743
Is there another system you know in which no one has experienced "extreme hardship?" Are you saying the driver in this article is an example of that?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #13759468
That's fair enough and I see that point. My intent is not to defend Kalanick, but I do instinctually defend free markets. I think Uber and its drivers found itself in a situation w…
-
comment
Comment #13759437
So, it matters that it was lowered but actual amounts are inconsequential? I reject that.
-
comment
Comment #13758510
Because I find it incredibly hard to believe that he would engage like this if he believed there was a possibility of the conversation being made public. Sure, I could be wrong, bu…
-
comment
Comment #13758440
Right, the driver didn't even know what the current Uber Black fair was...falsely claiming it was $2.75. Anyone would get annoyed when someone was telling you that you were essenti…
-
comment
Comment #13758382
Obviously, he did not know he was being filmed...so it was a secret.
-
comment
Comment #13758349
It seems like the driver should know these basic facts before he engages on the matter.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #13758096
The problem with this is that it ignores the economic realities that went into the decision of Uber to lower fairs and assumes that their demand would have remained the same with o…
-
comment
Comment #13758036
I don't consider it a fair discussion when the driver falsely insists the fair is $2.75/mile, when it is $3.75/mile and continues to pound the theme when Kalanick had already given…
-
comment
Comment #13758008
So, let me get this straight. Uber has lowered the fair once on Uber Black to $3.75/mile, yet it seems that this driver was falsely insisting it was $2.75/mile. That would be frust…
-
comment
Comment #12873560
Ok, I see that now, it was not always the case...it has been awhile since I looked through their documentation. TY!
-
comment
Comment #12873087
We're successfully running Dokku instances for various dev/qa environments, but I have not attempted containers in production as of yet. While Kubernetes seems to be the orchestrat…
-
comment
Comment #12794717
Which is why you rarely see successful lawsuits by companies toward former employees on this matter. Law is solidified by precedence and the rulings have been more and more against…
-
comment
Comment #12794059
I don't really understand the brouhaha either, unless my assumption is wrong that an opt-out option will be given for context based remapping on an app-by-app basis if not system w…