Viewing profile — phraseologist
phraseologist
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Oct 18, 2021, 6:58 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2
- Public activity
- 10 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About phraseologist
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #28918182
I only rejected his out-of-the-blue implementation of something that already had very different plans around it. There is room for whoever doesn't disregard what the readme says: "…
-
comment
Comment #28918005
You never came to the TES3MP server at all. You came to an unofficial server for Lua scripters and decided to tell everyone you were changing the C++ code to add combat events as y…
-
comment
Comment #28912401
Most of those bug fixes and complicated updates towards 0.47 were done by me on the work-in-progress branch, but you're pretending it's your credit somehow just because you took my…
-
comment
Comment #28911241
Not if a family member has died.
-
comment
Comment #28911091
There wasn't anything rude or combative in asking you to allow TES3MP to catch up with breaking changes in OpenMW one at a time, especially considering you had never interacted wit…
-
comment
Comment #28910622
You've never contributed to OpenMW. If you tried the same kind of unilateralism regarding features with them, they wouldn't appreciate it either.
-
comment
Comment #28910291
Development isn't halted, it was just slowed down by all the problems caused by the pandemic.
-
comment
Comment #28910220
You're not "everyone", you're just someone who didn't read the contribution guidelines in the readme and still feels like complaining about it to this day.
-
comment
Comment #28910064
If you are thinking of contributing, you should at least read what it says in the readme instead of pretending that not reading the readme was unfairly held against you: "For code …
-
comment
Comment #28909984
This is incorrect. You decided you were going to do a unilateral implementation of a feature without discussing it at all. It was an anti-collaboration mindset from you.