Viewing profile — paxys
paxys
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Sep 10, 2017, 11:48 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 84,498
- Public activity
- 12,522 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About paxys
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49225285
Doesn’t answer the question
-
comment
Comment #49224490
Why is Firefox a joke?
-
comment
Comment #49223302
All the software freedom people here will do everything except use Firefox.
-
comment
Comment #49215878
$100-200/mo is the subscription price. You aren’t going to go over. And you can select smaller models as well. Not everything has to be done by the most expensive one.
-
comment
Comment #49215468
How is $5/day irrelevant? In the $150/mo range you can get effectively unlimited usage of GPT 5.6 Sol (Pro plan). Why use a much weaker model for the same price?
-
comment
Comment #49214845
Remember that for the longest time the prevailing sentiment on this forum was that there’s no such thing as AI, and labs are just outsourcing the work to a bunch of contractors in …
-
comment
Comment #49203501
Nothing more real in research than academics fighting over credit and missed citations.
-
comment
Comment #49191006
Meta lets engineers use the best tools for the job. I doubt anyone internally is going to be rushing to switch from Claude Code or Codex.
-
comment
Comment #49190918
And how do you know who they all are?
-
comment
Comment #49189280
Where else would they publish it?
-
comment
Comment #49186945
It is not unexpected but something people have been shouting about since the idea was first floated.
-
comment
Comment #49186733
It is targeted at a dozen or so people at OpenAI and Anthropic, not you or me.
-
comment
Comment #49185600
I’m willing to bet a lot of money that the “chairman” role is a contractual obligation and he be will be gone the day it expires.
-
comment
Comment #49185568
DeepMind had a generational run as a pure AI research lab. AlphaGo, AlphaZero, protein folding, tensor improvements, weather forecasting, GNoME and so much more. Google leadership …
-
comment
Comment #49176450
Would an airgapped test have led to this outcome? What would you have learned about the model’s ability to social engineer and attack GitHub? Sure you can argue for better monitori…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49176357
“Should be” is not reality. These models are in the hands of plenty of companies and governments today.
-
comment
Comment #49176337
Why are you assuming that the other kinds of testing aren’t happening? Is there any source that says this was literally the first ever test with this model?
-
comment
Comment #49176271
So the first time the model gets internet access should be post-release in the hands of random people?
-
comment
Comment #49176244
Learning what the models are capable of is exactly what the test achieved, so I’d personally call it a success. So it created a few GitHub accounts. Who cares? Seeing the same beha…
-
comment
Comment #49176190
Are the models going to exclusively run on intranets?
-
comment
Comment #49176157
Because the agents aren’t going to run airgapped in real life. What’s the point of a test of capabilities that artificially restricts the attack area down to zero? What are you eve…
-
comment
Comment #49176125
Why?
-
comment
Comment #49173898
2000s Silicon Valley chic
-
comment
Comment #49172890
This entire OpenAI hardware thing is a vanity project by Sam Altman wanting really bad to be Steve Jobs. Just look at this comical announcment photo and letter from last year https…