Viewing profile — panxyh
panxyh
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Aug 05, 2020, 9:59 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 112
- Public activity
- 88 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About panxyh
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48330385
How about some common sense?
-
comment
Comment #48330366
All major car manufacturers do indeed have experience or access to experience in critical control design. The problem isn't in their abilities but in their choices.
-
comment
Comment #48330159
Yes, their purpose and usefulness is obvious. As a supplement. Mirrors should be left as they are.
-
comment
Comment #48330089
The discussion isn't as much about a common backing camera (which also falls under 'useful accessory' I mentioned), but about cameras replacing mirrors.
-
comment
Comment #48330058
> they have a century of experience with critical control design and placement that don't kill people Car manufacturers do too.
-
comment
Comment #48330041
Nothing to discuss here, the article is spot on. I doubt though that those top of the class manufacturers are this stupid. They are rather playing the stupidity of the common consu…
-
comment
Comment #48329992
Rear view cameras might be better than mirrors in terms of field of view. This doesn't make them objectively better. Disadvantages are well argumented in the article. They are an u…
-
comment
Comment #47483011
Yes, of course they were smarter.
-
comment
Comment #46402245
All a malicious website has to do to be convincing is to have a more conventional landing page then? The disk and sudo mentioned are good enough clues, then you have the about .
-
comment
Comment #46173892
The outcome is visible and not up for discussion, so is the fact that this is a problem for the influencer. He's getting his compassionate nodding and emotional support in the comm…
-
comment
Comment #46170839
The difference is wether the effect is intentional or not. "Non-technical" isn't an insult. What you call "well actually"ing is well within limits on a technical forum.
-
comment
Comment #46170711
Most people might think that someone doesn't need LLM for that.
-
comment
Comment #46044976
"We (...)"
-
comment
Comment #45973599
They should be educated, sure, but this can't be an education issue . Rather an issue of crappy upbringing and low intellect or, when it's a cultural thing, crappy culture.
-
comment
Comment #45830302
> Maybe we should just stop commenting about whether or not something is AI generated. It doesn't add anything to the discussion, and is a waste of time. Ok, sure! As for the rest,…
-
comment
Comment #45830213
> to me If it's absolute, then why add that? Mine "to me" gave me a different impression, but it being a "to me", I questioned, not accused. You perhaps recognize t0mas88 after all…
-
comment
Comment #45824720
I did. By apologising and making a question, not accusation. The commenter himself didn't seem hurt by it. I'd recommend raising your outrage threshold. I clearly am keeping this l…
-
comment
Comment #45824595
Oh, cheers then :) But regarding flight ability, wouldn't that be V2? I thought there exist conditions where V1 is well below rotation speed. Anyways, > to make sure you can stop b…
-
comment
Comment #45824238
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #45823262
I see now that it probably wasn't, but "nothing" is an overstatement. And knowledgeable and helpful responses can be AI, so there might be a fallacy somewhere in your offence-takin…
-
comment
Comment #45822552
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #45822502
> abort safely That's what I'm getting at. I want to abort unsafely. Imagine 400 meters of grass field after the end of the runway, and a water body. I'm asking wether such factors…
-
comment
Comment #45819085
Isn't there any margin? Does it calculate stopping before end of runway or before causing damage? Surely uncertainty about the situation contributes to defaulting to committing, bu…
-
comment
Comment #45806926
Traditionally, software engineers are smart people
-
comment
Comment #45664141
GP wasn't complaining.