Viewing profile — outsidetheparty
outsidetheparty
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Dec 02, 2014, 4:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,340
- Public activity
- 405 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About outsidetheparty
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40432424
This is a good thing you made, and you should feel good about it
-
comment
Comment #40432412
My guesses were so consistently wrong that I at first thought the site was making up frog/toad names based on the opposite of my answer. Then I guessed "toad" for what turned out t…
-
comment
Comment #37325425
Perhaps this is different for logged in users, but I’m seeing a page containing a single tweet and no way to find the rest.
-
comment
Comment #37253615
I thought it was a great example of unintended effects in a large complex system... and the CDC asking Blizzard "if they could use data from what they perceived as a planned diseas…
-
comment
Comment #37234669
The cut in pay is likely to drive you back to software pretty quickly, but: the debugging and problem-solving involved in electrical work on old houses bears a striking resemblance…
-
comment
Comment #37220983
Ha! Sorry. This was decades ago, anyway. Right after the sort-of-botched IPO he drove off in his shiny new Ferrari never to be seen again (like, seriously, that exit is the last me…
-
comment
Comment #37213573
I should have spotted it but didn't: They took me out skiing one day between interviews (they were courting me pretty hard, and good snow was a selling point for the region) and I …
-
comment
Comment #37179100
Definitely! The original post and discussion was an eye-opener for me; before that I never understood why some people would say "yes" to a request but then act put upon anyway, or …
-
comment
Comment #37178473
The original MetaFilter comment lays the idea out in a much more balanced way than this article does, imo. The discussion of the idea here looks to be well on its way to mirroring …
-
comment
Comment #37134595
I'm just enjoying the image of wealthy mind-hackers filling their workspaces with a helium-oxygen atmosphere. Sure, they might be able to think nine percent faster, but will anyone…
-
comment
Comment #37134550
The "denatured" part means it contains additives that make it poisonous and foul-tasting.
-
comment
Comment #37064031
Yep, I was looking in YouTube settings instead. I wouldn't have thought to leave YouTube to change a setting that affects YouTube, but it's a reasonable-in-hindsight design decisio…
-
comment
Comment #37055181
You're absolutely right, thank you. I was so hung up on "preferences" or "settings" being the place to look that I missed the link that was literally named the thing I was looking …
-
comment
Comment #37054684
I'll admit I was pleasantly surprised at the lack of dark patterns involved in turning these settings off: https://myactivity.google.com/u/1/activitycontrols Disabling a setting as…
-
comment
Comment #37036171
OK! Those are good and reasonable answers, I appreciate the response!
-
comment
Comment #37035563
I appreciate the intent here, but these are the immediate issues that leap to mind: * "Do work, but get paid only if we use it" feels potentially exploitative. You do mention a "ba…
-
comment
Comment #37034178
Went to the demo, instinctively used `cmd-w` to close one of the "desktop" windows, and was quickly reminded of one of the limitations of building an application like this inside a…
-
comment
Comment #36949302
The one where I struggled the longest was trying to put together the right webpack configuration to generate multiple static files based on input in markdown format. It kept switch…
-
comment
Comment #36948770
When I've tried using it I've generally found that it leads me in circles between incompatible versions of a framework or tool -- it'll give me syntax that's correct for one versio…
-
comment
Comment #36948679
The few times I've tried using ChatGPT or another LLM as a coding assist, the "confidently wrong answer that looks correct" was the entirety of my experience. (Mostly the failure m…
-
comment
Comment #36948576
Personally I go back and forth on whether the hostile, aggressive gatekeeping is part of why stack overflow is failing, or is part of what kept it functioning as long as it did. Pr…
-
comment
Comment #36948401
For sure. And their overall shiftiness whenever anyone calls attention to their plans ("oh, that FAQ's out of date," "oh that's a future feature," "oh that's not what we planned, e…
-
comment
Comment #36897188
The parts that could most safely be described as "scam", to my point of view, are * lying to users about protecting their privacy, while gathering and reselling more information th…
-
comment
Comment #36896755
> I feel the original intent, to be able to contribute directly back to page authors, was a noble one. It may not have played out as intended, but it wasn't a scam. The original in…
-
comment
Comment #36893456
"HTML First" versus "HTML Only" aside, I hadn't heard of this one before, and it looks promising. I've been looking for simpler frameworks that do less, because I'm tired of coming…