Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — onecommentonly

onecommentonly

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jun 07, 2013, 9:05 PM UTC
HN karma
97
Public activity
21 items

About onecommentonly

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #5848291

    Google may not like it, but facial recognition is coming soon to Glass Nah, both Google and NSA will love it.

  2. comment
    Comment #5848286

    Congress can one thing, CUT OFF funds. So "No money should be spent to allow any agency of the United States Government to search the phone records of Americans" would work.

  3. comment
    Comment #5846281

    They aren't telling, and that may be telling on itself. Court approval apparently is needed but then Verizon hands all metadata every day, based on a court approval.

  4. comment
    Comment #5846210

    PDF link of the description http://www.dni.gov/files/documents/Facts%20on%20the%20Collec...

  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #5845891

    Expected, unless the leaked doc said "ignore court order" or "kill the Presi..." leaking is illegal. The person that leaked this knew that he /she would be prosecuted, if... Let's …

  7. comment
    Comment #5845835

    True, if not for this http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/interactive/2013/jun/06/veri... The order, signed by Judge Roger Vinson, compels Verizon to produce to the NSA electronic copi…

  8. comment
    Comment #5845657

    Wow! Just waiting for "directly doesn't mean direct access" excuse. He has posted the slide, and considering what happened with Verizon I am likely to believe that Google, Facebook…

  9. comment
    Comment #5845645

    To Eric Schmidt: You have ZERO credibility in this issue. and this "Collection directly from the servers of these US service providers: Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook.."

  10. comment
    Comment #5844987

    If Google says that Takeout has all your information stored on Google, and if NSA wants everything for Person X, why isn't this ideal?

  11. comment
    Comment #5844975

    giving preferential treatment to the places frequented by our social networking friends, the places we mention in our emails, the sites we look up on the search engine. This all of…

  12. comment
    Comment #5844934

    To answer precisely: I have given more than $50 each to both ACLU and EFF in the past 10 years.

  13. comment
    Comment #5844878

    You are assuming I didn't write that $50 check.

  14. comment
    Comment #5844708

    It's a disgrace. Not to pick on any particular person, considering that Silicon Valley has dozens of billionaires and thousands of filthy rich people, but Sean Parker got lucky wit…

  15. comment
    Comment #5844684

    Google has way more data from a million little things we online than it should have. The government can easily get it, it can leak, get hacked etc. If the data isn't archived, no o…

  16. comment
    Comment #5844665

    "If they were servicing extremely-broad FISAs like Verizon's "send us all your phone metadata" then the distinction would be academic, but both Google and the NYT seem clear that G…

  17. comment
    Comment #5843258

    >> the fact that we do stand up for individual users' privacy and protection, for their right to have a personal life which is not ever shared with other people without their conse…

  18. comment
    Comment #5842227

    Verizon said what they could: we have to comply with the orders when we get them. Nothing weaselly, maybe because we read the judge's order. Why should we trust the safety of any i…

  19. comment
    Comment #5842134

    Either way, if Google has troves of info of everything you do online, NSA will get it. One way or another, front door, back door, in-direct access and what not

  20. comment
    Comment #5842122

    The Guardian suggested that more leaks are going to be published...

  21. comment
    Comment #5841887

    A few thoughts: It's unlikely that he cannot deny or admit giving data to NSA /FBI, because he both admitted and denied, albeit with weasel words. No "backdoor" and "no direct acce…