Viewing profile — nkurz
nkurz
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Feb 02, 2009, 5:05 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 54,373
- Public activity
- 6,001 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nkurz
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #49141018
> According to GOST technical standards, Russian language uses the semicolon to denote time: Is it correct that Russian officially uses a semicolon (;) to separate time elements, o…
-
comment
Comment #49140943
It's accessible for me in the US. But if it's not available where you are, try here: https://archive.is/qjCGK
-
comment
Comment #49122761
Not sure if it's what you meant, but archive.is and archive.org are unrelated.
-
comment
Comment #48708943
Yes, the diagrams help. The issue is that you aren't using standard English terminology. Typically, a "loaf" is the whole piece of bread as baked, although it's still called a loaf…
-
comment
Comment #48526288
Maybe I'm just slow this morning, but I had trouble figuring out what this story was about. The actual title on the linked article is "Historic co-determination helps monasteries n…
-
comment
Comment #48485590
Assuming you are planning to continue participating anyway, you should just respond. Presuming it's a good response, with a bit of luck someone will vouch for it and make it visibl…
-
comment
Comment #48482686
Is there any reason to trust Pangram's tool over Carlyle's reputation? I don't know whether this was AI generated or not, but an online tool claiming it's AI generated doesn't sway…
-
comment
Comment #48425567
https://refactoringenglish.com/tools/hn-popularity/
-
comment
Comment #48425495
I agree that it sends the wrong symbol, but actually Daniel is great. He cares tremendously about doing work that is actually real-world useful. I've co-written a few papers with h…
-
comment
Comment #48382479
You keep saying that you "can't read the article" rather than that you choose not to. Are you philosophically opposed to clicking the archive link in this thread: https://archive.p…
-
comment
Comment #48321989
Here's a starting point if you are intrigued: https://www.jessamyn.com/barth/colby.html The page above that has more info and other stories: https://www.jessamyn.com/barth/
-
comment
Comment #48243595
The judge's full decision (which is quite readable) is here: https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cr...
-
comment
Comment #48169065
I found it ironic that in an article by a brilliant linguist (and I mean that genuinely) about how fluidity of language can fool us into perceiving logic that isn't there that I wa…
-
comment
Comment #48054052
You probably know the details better than I do (and perhaps there's a later twist I'm unaware of) but in 2022 Cocker denied that it was Stratou: Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s This Cult…
-
comment
Comment #47964450
It's trickier than that. Modern processors are speculative, which means that they guess at the result for a comparison and keep going along one side of a branch as far as they can …
-
comment
Comment #47963452
> Unfortunately although we cut the search space to 2/3 of what it was for binary search at each step (1/3 vs 1/2), we do 3/2 as many comparisons at each step (one comparison 50% o…
-
comment
Comment #47903650
Full article: American military bases and other equipment in the Persian Gulf region suffered extensive damage from Iranian strikes that is far worse than publicly acknowledged and…
- story
-
comment
Comment #47771859
Most of what you are saying is correct, but I feel the need to respond to your far too many repeated assertions that "People do not eat tart cherries directly": Except for when the…
-
comment
Comment #47680203
Unfortunately that's not the way it works. If it's [flagged] [dead] because of user flagging, some users can vouch for it to revive it. But if it's merely [flagged] (with associate…
-
comment
Comment #47643717
Almost, but not quite. Only 49.8% of votes for President were for Trump: https://www.cnn.com/election/2024/results/president A more accurate claim might be "More people voted for T…
-
comment
Comment #47619148
I think the standard is that the parenthesized date shows the last update, not the original. Is this not correct?
-
comment
Comment #47497171
https://archive.is/JOlEv
-
comment
Comment #47453825
> I always figured the algorithm was much simpler, it would just use the same branch as last execution — should work fairly well. Sure, that would work significantly better than no…