Viewing profile — nixarian
nixarian
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Aug 13, 2018, 8:14 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 0
- Public activity
- 59 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nixarian
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #27348047
Keys last...how long? Electronics last...how long? Keys require how much power? Electronics..? These people are out of touch with reality.
-
comment
Comment #27229434
Ah so that could explain how the West has survived so long, when we have all the markers of a society that should already be dead.
-
comment
Comment #27138076
Yes, women working is starting to be over. It ruined everything. Here we are.
-
comment
Comment #26318470
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #26308452
"This isn't evil on anyone's part" Highly inaccurate
-
comment
Comment #26308445
One part of this article is HIGHLY inaccurate: "This isn't evil on anyone's part"
-
comment
Comment #24455377
Yeah, too bad there isn't a website that understand this issue, and has never had like counts, and whose participants largely deride the idea of like counts-and have for a long, lo…
-
comment
Comment #23075685
Wow I'm sure everyone can experience the exact same unique circumstances! all it takes is a few choices! there's nothing wrong with the fundamental structure of things! just follow…
-
comment
Comment #23070180
What do you expect, you delusional borderline psychopath. You have zero empathy, apparently. Why wouldn't they do things like that? They barely make enough to live. The whole syste…
-
comment
Comment #22541282
and what are the second-order and third-order consequences of abolishing gender roles? do we think every civlization set them up because they were all simultaneously bumbling and m…
-
comment
Comment #22533080
I read compulsory health insurance.
-
comment
Comment #22533070
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #21987172
Could, say, certain groups of people be more predisposed to easily learning, for example, complex math, or more disposed to certain types of behaviors than other groups of people?
-
comment
Comment #21971457
It's not like that. I understand your instinct is to be condescending towards men, which is sad - and to be honest, I agree, the rant is missing the point. Chances are those women …
-
comment
Comment #21969707
Was she unemployed or low income at the time? Does she currently make more money than you? Were you ambitious, and display that ambition to impress her? Having a humble wife is for…
-
comment
Comment #21969670
Because SHE CAN MAKE HER OWN MONEY. That's why. How do you not see that? And status doesn't always equate to money, yet status is what is selected for, not money, exactly. Money is…
-
comment
Comment #21175928
If writing is thinking, how are there feminist writers?
-
comment
Comment #20474805
It's women, not technology, not anything else. I know this might be downvoted to oblivion, but I have to say it, so at least the truth is where it needs to be.
-
comment
Comment #20447700
>I learned another big lesson from this. I now never help people who don’t ask me for help, and even then I only help them to the extent that they ask. I also look for ways that I …
-
comment
Comment #20379030
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #20365531
Sure. "Internet." That's ALL they'll be doing up there.
-
comment
Comment #20269895
That's interesting. How equally dangerous would it be if, for example, someone spread misinformation about a party in an attempt to label them as untrustworthy. You could control o…
-
comment
Comment #20230566
Too real
-
comment
Comment #20199231
Paternity testing should be mandatory at the birth of the child. Adultery is socially destabilizing, and should be discouraged.
-
comment
Comment #20121006
Wealthy 'people' are more likely to have families because women are more likely to marry wealthy men, and are more likely to remain with wealthy men. It's hypergamy, which was unle…