Viewing profile — nil-sec
nil-sec
HN member- Joined
- Wed, May 09, 2018, 6:42 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 149
- Public activity
- 91 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nil-sec
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35979587
Sorry maybe I should have added more explanation. One way to think about attention, which is the main distinguishing element in a transformer, is as an adaptable matrix. A feedforw…
-
comment
Comment #35979353
I guess I was more thinking about self attention, so yes. The more general case is covered by your notation!
-
comment
Comment #35978884
Feedforward: y=Wx Attention: y=W(x)x W is Matrix, x & y Are vectors. In the second case, W is a function of the input.
-
comment
Comment #33306854
I had the same experience a couple of years back when people started discussing AI. I try to keep this in mind but somehow I keep forgetting. It’s genuinely difficult to filter goo…
-
comment
Comment #33288308
It’s quite nice to have something irreversible though. It gives you time. Also nobody really thinks QM is the end of it, assuming semi classical physics under the hood is just odd …
-
comment
Comment #31543417
It’s funny because, for me, this was one of the major confusions when I moved from Europe to the US. In Europe, there are a lot of prominent subcultures, particularly in college. T…
-
comment
Comment #31011964
This isn’t true, the quality of images generated by DALL-E are really good, but they are an incremental improvement and based on a long chain of prior work. See e.g. https://github…
-
comment
Comment #30522136
Insane take, the west vs Russia in open confrontation ends in a nuclear winter.
-
comment
Comment #28292611
I have no background in control theory but this sounds very similar to the identifiability problem in nonlinear ICA. Are those equivalent?
-
comment
Comment #26969748
This is a good point which I think stems from wrongly equating human level intelligence to AGI in the popular literature. It’s not at all clear what a general intelligence should b…
-
comment
Comment #26969704
While I agree with the general point of this paper I don’t think it’s quite right to compare the current situation with the last AI spring. It’s not AGI but it’s very good narrow A…
-
comment
Comment #26393038
For a given causal model it is (1) in my understanding.
-
comment
Comment #26390517
For one it lets you avoid controlling for the wrong variables and causing e.g. spurious correlations by doing so. In fact this is one of the best examples of why a causal model is …
-
comment
Comment #25260419
It is incomprehensible to you, because you just simply do not understand what your parent is talking about. You are the ignorant one here and indeed quite rude. Doesn't matter that…
-
comment
Comment #25043800
Agreed, I trained a 3D version of b0-b2 on a classification task I worked on and besides being very slow to train they did not outperform a simple baseline VGG architecture. Intere…
-
comment
Comment #24974646
Location: Zürich Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: Yes, within Europe. Technologies: Pytorch, Tensorflow, Python, C++, JS, HTML/CSS, Gurobi, MongoDB CV: https://nilsec.github.io Ema…
-
comment
Comment #24954214
They could have used all negative samples for testing (and even training if they would have done it better), yes. But once your test set is large enough, whatever that means, its n…
-
comment
Comment #24953887
1. Isn't an issue. They make inference on a sample by sample basis. The network has no memory so it won't expect a 50/50 distribution on the test set just because its trained like …
-
comment
Comment #24824334
Would love to play around with this data but there are no seeds for this torrent. Anyone here who can provide this dataset?
-
comment
Comment #23777680
Let me be very concrete: There is currently a lot of research being done in so called “contrastive learning”. This is an unsupervised technique in which you train a network to buil…
-
comment
Comment #23767539
I happen to work in AI research and what you are saying isn’t true. There is theoretical machine learning and applications of it. They are distinct. The former is largely task agno…
-
comment
Comment #23767379
In industry, yes. I had the impression this article was aimed at academia and research in AI.
-
comment
Comment #23767242
The fraction of people in AI working on problems that need to consider diversity/fairness/etc. is rather small. Yes, those people, these specific applications, should be designed w…
-
comment
Comment #23562954
This is a very one-sided view of what this article is talking about. That there is systemic racism in the US is not up for debate. It's a fact. Even if your back of the envelope ca…
- story