Viewing profile — newacct583
newacct583
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Apr 23, 2020, 9:05 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 736
- Public activity
- 1,323 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About newacct583
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #29312533
South Korea certainly seems like a success, with a per capita death rate about 3% of what the US saw. In fact contrary to your point, there is a very wide spread in covid impact fr…
-
comment
Comment #29282332
To be clear: "safe" in this context generally implies more than merely "physically unharmed". It's quite clear that Jack Ma was coerced into giving up control of Alibaba. It seems …
-
comment
Comment #29269469
The first example cites what I guess is an attempted cancellation of Peter Thiel: > In his recent book “The Contrarian,” journalist Max Chafkin assigns an ideology to Mr. Thiel, th…
-
comment
Comment #29165527
Obviously true, but still on balance government-directed spending (especially outside the US, but even here too) is more likely to take long term goals like climate mitigation seri…
-
comment
Comment #29162544
Which is sort of the same thing. "I don't want to run this expensive or complicated test because it's stupid" is certainly a kind of cost cutting.
-
comment
Comment #29161631
Only in a specious sense. The point to money isn't "scarcity", the point to money is TRUST . You trust that $1 is going to be worth $1 tomorrow, and that it will be worth $1 to the…
-
comment
Comment #29150394
This seems like an attempt at misdirection. In a lawful society, the reason for surveilling suspected terrorists is because you actually suspect them of terrorism, not because they…
-
comment
Comment #29145688
> This was a motion for a temporary injunction so all the court said was "there are grave statutory and constitutional concerns" and so the relief was granted. That's right. And tw…
-
comment
Comment #29142842
You're making up arguments that the fifth didn't even bother to, though. If that was their reasoning, then why didn't they say so?
-
comment
Comment #29142830
This isn't about getting it Right or Wrong though. This is about making pre-trial injunction decisions based on baldly partisan reasoning. The 9th and 6th may have a "partisan" vie…
-
comment
Comment #29142291
So depressing. The argument was that there are "grave constitutional concerns" with allowing implementation of the mandate (which is odd to begin with, considering that medical pra…
-
comment
Comment #29124393
First, the idea of "conflict of interest" is not about allowing or disallowing testimony. That's (1) normally an argument you make after testimony and (2) absolutely not something …
-
comment
Comment #29074718
> Those are transitory Exactly. So is the pandemic. And so is the resulting inflation. I think you agree with me.
-
comment
Comment #29074682
Not for five years they aren't! That chart ends in a few months. It's just reflecting CURRENT inflation rates. Again I ask, because everyone insists on cherry picking their way aro…
-
comment
Comment #29073130
True enough, though if the modern real estate market had existed in the 70's then "inflation" would have been something closer to 30-40%. Like it or not "home values" decoupled fro…
-
comment
Comment #29068187
That's almost exactly backwards, where are you getting this? The big inflation driver right now is (1) the increase in liquid cash in the economy due to covid relief programs and (…
-
comment
Comment #29068131
> But the biggest losers overall are those with fixed incomes dealing with rapidly rising prices. And therein lies one of the big pseudo-centrist points here. A mild reduction[1] i…
-
comment
Comment #29068116
Great, then surely you can cite me the source you used to predict that general inflation (not, ahem, some cherry picked real estate numbers) would be higher than 7% over the life o…
-
comment
Comment #29067661
Cite for that? No one with any expertise has predicted a >7% inflation level that I'm aware of. This sounds like something you got from talk radio. (Edit: two replies have taken th…
-
comment
Comment #29067628
We would not be "in the Cater [sic] Years" regardless. The lowest inflation reported in the late 70's was about 5%, with a peak at 15%. Last year's post-covid number was 5.4%. Your…
-
comment
Comment #29058010
Stop with the conspiracy theories. There are no "anti-nuclear folks" in this thread. It's a bunch of people looking at a balance sheet and trying to decide on how to prioritize ene…
-
comment
Comment #29057334
> New reactors coming that are way, way less expensive. They've been "coming" since the 1960's. Start yelling about building stuff when they've arrived.
-
comment
Comment #29057319
You're just throwing up arguments to see what sticks here. Almost everything you're saying is wrong or misdirected. > Never mind that the plants consume CO2. The linked technique i…
-
comment
Comment #29057259
> treat it as literally unlocking the next level of human development That was literally the way it was thought about a three quarters of a century ago. It... didn't work out. It's…
-
comment
Comment #29039198
The subject at hand was whether or not people, even ones who make messes, should have access to public bathrooms, not whether or not you should be expected to have someone over for…