Viewing profile — neojima

Yeah, hobbyist niche sites like these: https://clintonwhitehouse1.archives.gov/ https://clintonwhitehouse2.archives.gov/

Backward compatibility was never really the problem; the problem is that forward compatibility with ANY successor protocol (without modifying IPv4) is a fundamental impossibility. …

Additionally, their fixed-wireless product gives you a physical CPE that does the CLAT (NAT46) side of the 464XLAT. To the local network, it looks like there's native IPv4, but it'…

2.7 - 4.0 years, by my math, so I would agree with your assessment. ...but that's based on pre-IANA-runout rates, though, and doesn't account for the pent-up backpressure of demand…

Anyone who's ever had to delegate DNS authority on anything other than an 8-bit boundary can understand the value of that feature. At face value, yeah, that's replacing "8" with "4…

This is pretty remarkable, given that RFC 1883 is only 30 years old.

This. "Vibes," vs. data.

It officially started becoming scarce in 2011, when IANA, and then APNIC, depleted their IPv4 "free" pools, FWIW. Things have only gotten worse from there. Cloud computing doesn't …

> And if I'm reading the ARIN fees correctly, it only costs $4000 annually for a "/16" allocation: For better or worse, you're not; that's for IPv4 /16. For IPv6 /16, it'd be the X…

I have been working with IP based networks for over 20 years, and specifically IPv6 networks for over 17 of those. IPv6 is the main reason I got my current job, FWIW. > The use of …

That's another benefit of https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/ -- the tables, including down to ASN.

https://labs.apnic.net/?p=479 https://labs.apnic.net/?p=655 From what I've gleaned, the use of Google ads catches the use case of people who don't actively use Google -- based on t…

Just to warn you, even on T-Mobile, not all hotspot devices support IPv6 (either by default or at all). I forget if inbound connections work, though.

- APNIC ran out in 2011, but has a new-LIR pool remaining - RIPE ran out in 2012, but has a new-LIR pool remaining (part of which is that /8 you mentioned) - LACNIC ran out in 2014…

I'd half agree with this; for those who are actively working on this, yes, the low-hanging fruit are all done, but there's still plenty of low-hanging fruit in organizations where …

a) It's a translator, not a tunnel. b) You're ultimately still right that it enables connectivity to IPv4-only resources, but depending on the IPv6 client device, you may NEED to u…

> With IPv4 my ISP has to shuffle IPs with every reconnect. With IPv6 you could get one IP for lifetime? In theory, yes; in practice, most ISPs will give you a new prefix via DHCPv…

As mentioned/hinted by ancarda: a) You missed Belgium. (Common oversight, due to the size on the map.) b) Google's stats have something of a US-centric bias; https://stats.labs.apn…

As others have said, most major operating systems implemented RFC4941 (IPv6 Privacy Extensions) years ago. Unless you're using unmaintained OSes (in which case you shouldn't be com…

In 2005 or so, sure. Now...not so much? What privacy erosion/easier tracking are you talking about that wasn't remedied by the very wide deployment of RFC4941 (IPv6 Privacy Extensi…

Any word on IPv6 support?