Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — neoclassical

neoclassical

HN member
Joined
Thu, Aug 06, 2009, 4:01 AM UTC
HN karma
5
Public activity
11 items

About neoclassical

http://tinyurl.com/olae

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #798139

    Consider reading the originals upon which she almost certainly based her ideas: Plato "The Republic" and Nietzsche "Human, All Too Human"

  2. comment
    Comment #798136

    "The Multicultural Mystique," by H.E. Baber "Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World," by Jack Weatherford Both interesting, although in that "factual book designed for mas…

  3. comment
    Comment #792785

    I oppose voting down. It encourages a lynch mob mentality. What helps instead is an ability to, Slashdot-like, tag posts with warnings: spam, stupid, irrelevant, "humor," etc.

  4. comment
    Comment #792784

    It's the "ad populum" fallacy in numeric form.

  5. comment
    Comment #769831

    Slayer. If that's not available, I love classical.

  6. comment
    Comment #764744

    Reminds me of this article: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_34/b41440368... People applying known technology in new variations, but not pushing any boundaries or re…

  7. comment
    Comment #746977

    Weekend shredder here.

  8. comment
    Comment #745531

    The only solution I've found to past digital data is to keep converting it to whatever current OS, file system and media I'm using, which works with a lot of it. Had I had more for…

  9. comment
    Comment #745526

    Knowing vi means that on any machine you have the ability to edit text... not a bad trade-off, if you ask me. It's also a nice break if you're tired of a Macintosh or Vista UAC ask…

  10. comment
    Comment #745513

    Downvoting is pointless. It encourages mass retribution against unpopular but valid topics. As someone else said, if a topic is broken -- spam, stupid or otherwise useless -- it sh…

  11. comment
    Comment #744785

    It's a cheap shot, but it does cut down on obliviously repeating the process you've been taught. We want people to read directions for any new process, no?