Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mtlynch

mtlynch

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jun 16, 2017, 1:13 PM UTC
HN karma
14,700
Public activity
1,762 items

About mtlynch

I blog about software and entrepreneurship at https://mtlynch.io

I'm writing a book to help developers improve their writing at https://refactoringenglish.com

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49184619

    I tried using it, but it didn't work well in my experience. There was be a huge textarea for notes, so I'd write detailed notes after a good conversation, but it didn't auto-save, …

  2. comment
    Comment #49156575

    Also a happy Kagi user since 2023, and full disclosure: I participated in their crowdfund, so I have some financial stake in the company that I don't really understand. I'm always …

  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #49051419

    Reposting is officially allowed: > Are reposts ok? > If a story has not had significant attention in the last year or so, a small number of reposts is ok. Otherwise we bury reposts…

  5. comment
    Comment #49021274

    Yeah, exactly. If there's a C2 server, there's some protocol for communication between the C2 server and each victim node. You can intentionally infect a machine with the malware b…

  6. comment
    Comment #49015535

    > Naturally, the next move was pivoting from defense to offense. I wanted to see if the attackers left any vulnerable services exposed on their IP. Why not attack them through the …

  7. comment
    Comment #48983268

    I think we disagree on the connotation of the word "lead." To me, if someone describes me as a "lead," it implies that they are focused on making the sale rather than on anything e…

  8. comment
    Comment #48982985

    OP here. I wrote the post myself with no AI (modulo grammar checks). What makes you think it's AI-generated?

  9. comment
    Comment #48982629

    OP here. Thanks for reading! I'm having trouble understanding where we disagree. It seems like you're arguing that she's correct because it was helpful for the mutual acquaintance …

  10. comment
    Comment #48982206

    I appreciate the critique! Sometimes when I'm thinking about a blog post, I fall in love with a joke I want to use, but then it constrains how I think about the topic. I still like…

  11. comment
    Comment #48981983

    OP here. Thanks for reading! I'm not trying to argue that art is sacred and we have to hold it up over everything else, but I am joking that there is still an implicit boundary whe…

  12. comment
    Comment #48981681

    OP here. Thanks for reading! > I feel that all the terms mentioned are useful in specific contexts. Web traffic brings visitors to your resource. If they read your blog, they becom…

  13. comment
    Comment #48981640

    OP here. Thanks for reading! I don't really have anything against the existence of the catchall term "content." Like, I don't expect the CEO of YouTube to say, "music, short film, …

  14. story
  15. comment
    Comment #48936009

    Are you talking about this line? > What Kelley can't do is say, "It's an outright fabrication that Sumner does X today," based on an observation from nine months ago. I think it's …

  16. story
  17. comment
    Comment #48890581

    Right, that part is not in dispute. If Sumner says today, "We do X," then Kelley can say, "Nine months ago, Sumner did not do X," and both can be correct. What Kelley can't do is s…

  18. comment
    Comment #48890385

    One of the things I find so disappointing about Kelley's behavior here is that he falsely accused Jarred Sumner of lying about fuzzing Bun, and then when Sumner showed evidence[0] …

  19. story
  20. comment
    Comment #48866308

    I'm having trouble understanding what you mean. If I say, "I run 5 miles every day" and my old neighbor says, "I lived next door to him until 9 months ago, and he definitely doesn'…

  21. comment
    Comment #48860502

    Andrew was wrong. He stealth edited his post to hide it. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48854921

  22. comment
    Comment #48849407

    > For me, using Fuzzilli for testing a Zig code is not fuzzing, it's integration testing. If you're running code externally (e.g. wrapping binary) you cannot guarantee that side ef…

  23. comment
    Comment #48847068

    Yes, "their" refers to Bun's code, not the Zig compiler's code. Fuzzili is a fuzzing engine for JavaScript, so integrating it into Bun means that Fuzzili is fuzzing Bun.[0] From th…

  24. comment
    Comment #48766883

    This is what Jason Cohen did when he was getting WPEngine off the ground. He messaged 40 WordPress consultants on LinkedIn and offered to pay them higher than their hourly rate sin…

  25. comment
    Comment #48718710

    OP here. Happy to take any feedback or questions about this post.