Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mspecter

mspecter

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jan 17, 2013, 7:27 PM UTC
HN karma
323
Public activity
56 items

About mspecter

Assistant Professor at Georgia Tech mikespecter.com

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49051551

    Also, I'm just the professor, the grad students on it are the real heroes: Akshaya Kumar [1] and Anna Raymaker [2]. [1] https://akumar805.github.io/ [2] https://annaraymaker.dad/

  2. comment
    Comment #49051525

    Interesting! Hadn't heard of it.

  3. comment
    Comment #49051418

    In general, yes! We did some follow on work explaining how all of this works, depending on the provider: https://petsymposium.org/popets/2026/popets-2026-0113.pdf

  4. comment
    Comment #49051301

    Last author on the paper here ( https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.00350 ). Happy to answer any questions!

  5. comment
    Comment #49026819

    Good point. Most of this was written before the signal-custom-client thing happened, so it wasn't top of mind. We also considered "serious" systems, deployed en masse. Perhaps we s…

  6. comment
    Comment #49026170

    Oh, I didn't realize it'd made it to Schneier's blog, thanks for letting me know! A goal of the work was to try to explain to a new audience (specifically nontechnical legal folks)…

  7. comment
    Comment #49024854

    Coauthor here, somewhat surprised to see this on HN. Any thoughts, questions, or feedback welcome.

  8. comment
    Comment #46740084

    The secret ballot is usually considered a core goal of an elections system, blockchain involvement or not.

  9. comment
    Comment #46740078

    I have not personally, but there's some fantastic work on the subject: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9152765?signou... They find a few really bad issues. IIRC, the …

  10. comment
    Comment #46715281

    You might be interested in some prior work on blockchain voting, it's a bit harder to get right than one might think, and actually introduces some problems [1,2]. [1] https://www.u…

  11. comment
    Comment #46715267

    Hey all, coauthor here. Interesting to see it on Hacker News. I'm a professor in Georgia Tech's CS dept that works on problems related to security, privacy, and public policy. (CV:…

  12. story
  13. story
  14. comment
    Comment #25118064

    Hi! Check out our Usenix 2021 paper on exactly this topic. The key insight is to release private keys over time: http://www.mit.edu/~specter/blog/2020/dkim/

  15. story
  16. story
  17. comment
    Comment #22641491

    To push this further, I was working on a research paper with Ron Rivest, Neha Narula (head of MIT's decentralized currency initiative), and Sunoo Park (a wonderful applied cryptogr…

  18. comment
    Comment #22641464

    > How confident are you that we could reach a well engineered and proofed electronic voting platform that also adheres to theoretical rules around vote security? I don't think we c…

  19. comment
    Comment #22641049

    To put this in short-hand: "We bank online, we buy all sorts of stuff online, why not vote?" The biggest reason is that banking and other financial transactions have a very differe…

  20. comment
    Comment #22640676

    That's a wonderful question. The honest answer is that I have no idea. In the version we reverse engineered, there's no proof of inclusion of any of the data in the blockchain in t…

  21. comment
    Comment #22640245

    Oh, hi. I'm Mike Specter, lead author on the MIT report [1], and have been involved in other voting-related research projects [2,3]. LMK if you all have any questions! 1. https://i…

  22. story
  23. comment
    Comment #19994809

    Hijacking this to say that we need the following: 1. Risk Limiting Audits (RLAs)[1] 2. Software independence [2] 3. Paper-backed ballots (which are the official record of the vote)…

  24. comment
    Comment #19765853

    Yep! https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/gjs/6.945/ I'm in his group at MIT.

  25. comment
    Comment #19734956

    Sure, though, to be pedantic, a common example of moral hazard is the increased likelihood of driving recklessly in the presence of mandatory seat belts. See https://web.stanford.e…