Viewing profile — mspecter
mspecter
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 17, 2013, 7:27 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 323
- Public activity
- 56 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mspecter
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49051551
Also, I'm just the professor, the grad students on it are the real heroes: Akshaya Kumar [1] and Anna Raymaker [2]. [1] https://akumar805.github.io/ [2] https://annaraymaker.dad/
-
comment
Comment #49051525
Interesting! Hadn't heard of it.
-
comment
Comment #49051418
In general, yes! We did some follow on work explaining how all of this works, depending on the provider: https://petsymposium.org/popets/2026/popets-2026-0113.pdf
-
comment
Comment #49051301
Last author on the paper here ( https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.00350 ). Happy to answer any questions!
-
comment
Comment #49026819
Good point. Most of this was written before the signal-custom-client thing happened, so it wasn't top of mind. We also considered "serious" systems, deployed en masse. Perhaps we s…
-
comment
Comment #49026170
Oh, I didn't realize it'd made it to Schneier's blog, thanks for letting me know! A goal of the work was to try to explain to a new audience (specifically nontechnical legal folks)…
-
comment
Comment #49024854
Coauthor here, somewhat surprised to see this on HN. Any thoughts, questions, or feedback welcome.
-
comment
Comment #46740084
The secret ballot is usually considered a core goal of an elections system, blockchain involvement or not.
-
comment
Comment #46740078
I have not personally, but there's some fantastic work on the subject: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9152765?signou... They find a few really bad issues. IIRC, the …
-
comment
Comment #46715281
You might be interested in some prior work on blockchain voting, it's a bit harder to get right than one might think, and actually introduces some problems [1,2]. [1] https://www.u…
-
comment
Comment #46715267
Hey all, coauthor here. Interesting to see it on Hacker News. I'm a professor in Georgia Tech's CS dept that works on problems related to security, privacy, and public policy. (CV:…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #25118064
Hi! Check out our Usenix 2021 paper on exactly this topic. The key insight is to release private keys over time: http://www.mit.edu/~specter/blog/2020/dkim/
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #22641491
To push this further, I was working on a research paper with Ron Rivest, Neha Narula (head of MIT's decentralized currency initiative), and Sunoo Park (a wonderful applied cryptogr…
-
comment
Comment #22641464
> How confident are you that we could reach a well engineered and proofed electronic voting platform that also adheres to theoretical rules around vote security? I don't think we c…
-
comment
Comment #22641049
To put this in short-hand: "We bank online, we buy all sorts of stuff online, why not vote?" The biggest reason is that banking and other financial transactions have a very differe…
-
comment
Comment #22640676
That's a wonderful question. The honest answer is that I have no idea. In the version we reverse engineered, there's no proof of inclusion of any of the data in the blockchain in t…
-
comment
Comment #22640245
Oh, hi. I'm Mike Specter, lead author on the MIT report [1], and have been involved in other voting-related research projects [2,3]. LMK if you all have any questions! 1. https://i…
- story
-
comment
Comment #19994809
Hijacking this to say that we need the following: 1. Risk Limiting Audits (RLAs)[1] 2. Software independence [2] 3. Paper-backed ballots (which are the official record of the vote)…
-
comment
Comment #19765853
Yep! https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/gjs/6.945/ I'm in his group at MIT.
-
comment
Comment #19734956
Sure, though, to be pedantic, a common example of moral hazard is the increased likelihood of driving recklessly in the presence of mandatory seat belts. See https://web.stanford.e…