Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mrbadguy

mrbadguy

HN member
Joined
Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 12:13 PM UTC
HN karma
70
Public activity
56 items

About mrbadguy

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47013369

    Arranged marriages are not the same as forced marriages. Your family simply plays matchmaker and it’s up to the prospective couple to decide whether they want to be together.

  2. comment
    Comment #46726779

    Man you got me on readability. Just yesterday I had to input a random string WiFi password in a printer with only arrow keys to select each character. The password had an upper-cas…

  3. comment
    Comment #46606177

    You’re right. My point was more about the idea that “higher frame rate = better movie because the number is objective” rather than “all art is subjective”. In other words, I don’t …

  4. comment
    Comment #46601163

    If people don’t report crime then we have to leave it. The answer can’t be just to invade everyone’s privacy looking for crimes (before they’re even committed!)

  5. comment
    Comment #46431537

    Agreed, the idea that there’s anything “objective” about art is kind of hilarious. Yes, it may be technically better in that there are more frames but does it make a more enjoyable…

  6. comment
    Comment #46431527

    Your film, too?

  7. comment
    Comment #46397025

    Yeah bone conduction headphones are awful, I don’t know how people tolerate them.

  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #45529451

    Keep at it, friend. You are not alone.

  10. comment
    Comment #45508696

    It’s even worse than that: someone else shipped the bug and you have to work without pay to fix it.

  11. comment
    Comment #45488865

    Yeah the comments here are slightly surreal; the issue was that they didn’t have an off-site backup at all, not that it wasn’t on AWS or whatever.

  12. comment
    Comment #45482384

    Agreed, a single thread is painful if it’s actually spawning off multiple sub-topics. I suppose the better answer is to start a separate thread in Slack in that case but it can flo…

  13. comment
    Comment #44864020

    Maybe you should try it

  14. comment
    Comment #44635426

    Their latest sham is the bag sizing box that has one side open. So, even if your bag would actually fit into a volume of the required size, if any of it is loose (often the case wi…

  15. comment
    Comment #43668878

    Nailed it. All of the “progress” in the last, say, 20 years is exactly this. They call it “disruption” and wear the title “disruptor” as a badge of honour.

  16. comment
    Comment #43453864

    Well said. There’s a noticeable lack of judgement in many places these days; people think they can abdicate it to metrics and data but this is mistaken.

  17. comment
    Comment #43010019

    That’s simply untrue. The old way was definitely better because, with OTA, the manufacturers will succumb to the usual web-software bullshit of “we don’t have to sell them somethin…

  18. comment
    Comment #42548241

    These kinds of announcements are quite misleading IMO. It’s not like smoking a single cigarette immediately takes off 20 minutes, it’s a cumulative effect caused by years of heavy …

  19. comment
  20. comment
    Comment #42529606

    This is an odd complaint. It’s not a waste of anything to update a record on an official document. Indeed, it’s more frustrating when they don’t because now I can’t see my full tra…

  21. comment
    Comment #42478439

    How’s that not true for just about any country?

  22. comment
    Comment #42446719

    I’m not American and I totally agree. Y’all and all y’all are brilliant!

  23. comment
    Comment #42440030

    It’s fairly mindless boilerplate for sure, but it does mean that when something happens that causes a change like this protobuf update, the change in your codebase is isolated just…

  24. comment
    Comment #42327745

    Oh I see, thanks for the clarification! Personally, I'm fine without that and with something like func Foo(r io.Reader) { var m MyStruct binary.Read(r, binary.LittleEndian, &m) } b…

  25. comment
    Comment #42255051

    Can you please give me an example of what you don’t like? I’m not sure I understand the “write the code manually to do a struct” bit. You have to define the struct for sure, but be…