Viewing profile — mrbadguy
mrbadguy
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 12:13 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 70
- Public activity
- 56 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mrbadguy
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47013369
Arranged marriages are not the same as forced marriages. Your family simply plays matchmaker and it’s up to the prospective couple to decide whether they want to be together.
-
comment
Comment #46726779
Man you got me on readability. Just yesterday I had to input a random string WiFi password in a printer with only arrow keys to select each character. The password had an upper-cas…
-
comment
Comment #46606177
You’re right. My point was more about the idea that “higher frame rate = better movie because the number is objective” rather than “all art is subjective”. In other words, I don’t …
-
comment
Comment #46601163
If people don’t report crime then we have to leave it. The answer can’t be just to invade everyone’s privacy looking for crimes (before they’re even committed!)
-
comment
Comment #46431537
Agreed, the idea that there’s anything “objective” about art is kind of hilarious. Yes, it may be technically better in that there are more frames but does it make a more enjoyable…
-
comment
Comment #46431527
Your film, too?
-
comment
Comment #46397025
Yeah bone conduction headphones are awful, I don’t know how people tolerate them.
-
comment
Comment #45878917
For now
-
comment
Comment #45529451
Keep at it, friend. You are not alone.
-
comment
Comment #45508696
It’s even worse than that: someone else shipped the bug and you have to work without pay to fix it.
-
comment
Comment #45488865
Yeah the comments here are slightly surreal; the issue was that they didn’t have an off-site backup at all, not that it wasn’t on AWS or whatever.
-
comment
Comment #45482384
Agreed, a single thread is painful if it’s actually spawning off multiple sub-topics. I suppose the better answer is to start a separate thread in Slack in that case but it can flo…
-
comment
Comment #44864020
Maybe you should try it
-
comment
Comment #44635426
Their latest sham is the bag sizing box that has one side open. So, even if your bag would actually fit into a volume of the required size, if any of it is loose (often the case wi…
-
comment
Comment #43668878
Nailed it. All of the “progress” in the last, say, 20 years is exactly this. They call it “disruption” and wear the title “disruptor” as a badge of honour.
-
comment
Comment #43453864
Well said. There’s a noticeable lack of judgement in many places these days; people think they can abdicate it to metrics and data but this is mistaken.
-
comment
Comment #43010019
That’s simply untrue. The old way was definitely better because, with OTA, the manufacturers will succumb to the usual web-software bullshit of “we don’t have to sell them somethin…
-
comment
Comment #42548241
These kinds of announcements are quite misleading IMO. It’s not like smoking a single cigarette immediately takes off 20 minutes, it’s a cumulative effect caused by years of heavy …
-
comment
Comment #42543544
What?
-
comment
Comment #42529606
This is an odd complaint. It’s not a waste of anything to update a record on an official document. Indeed, it’s more frustrating when they don’t because now I can’t see my full tra…
-
comment
Comment #42478439
How’s that not true for just about any country?
-
comment
Comment #42446719
I’m not American and I totally agree. Y’all and all y’all are brilliant!
-
comment
Comment #42440030
It’s fairly mindless boilerplate for sure, but it does mean that when something happens that causes a change like this protobuf update, the change in your codebase is isolated just…
-
comment
Comment #42327745
Oh I see, thanks for the clarification! Personally, I'm fine without that and with something like func Foo(r io.Reader) { var m MyStruct binary.Read(r, binary.LittleEndian, &m) } b…
-
comment
Comment #42255051
Can you please give me an example of what you don’t like? I’m not sure I understand the “write the code manually to do a struct” bit. You have to define the struct for sure, but be…