Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — midmagico

midmagico

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jan 13, 2012, 7:59 AM UTC
HN karma
38
Public activity
84 items

About midmagico

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #45466546

    pfft, real neutral pov there

  2. comment
    Comment #45460379

    Most of the article is technically ill-informed; unfortunately, much of the logic, while sound if it were based on factual reality, fails in that sense. The gaslighting in this cas…

  3. comment
    Comment #45453803

    lol ArtForz was an engineer who single-handedly designed from scratch low-run book printing machines, built his house with CHP that he designed and created himself, created his own…

  4. comment
    Comment #41803368

    I'm not gmax, mike, which you definitely knew on IRC when you offered to help me deal with criminal harassment on IRC by handing me +o status in the channels where they were harass…

  5. comment
    Comment #41802883

    man that guy is an idiot

  6. comment
  7. comment
    Comment #41802369

    > The fact that the inputs, outputs, and fee of a transaction must add up isn't exactly "detailed knowledge" :) They don't have to! (re: txid 5d80a29be1609db91658b401f85921a86ab475…

  8. comment
    Comment #41802288

    The massive amount of additional logic and thought about Satoshi from OG'ers (e.g. |}ruid etc) that have come out in response to this terrible effort, IMO is partly the purpose of …

  9. comment
    Comment #41802250

    Most people have no way to more-deeply authenticate those emails because you didn't provide headers. Many people, myself included, would love some way to better-rule-out whether pa…

  10. comment
    Comment #41793759

    Complete nonsense, lol.

  11. comment
    Comment #39860989

    This is all pretty much boring, tired lies that altcoin profiteers like to trot out apparently assuming nobody is still around who is interested in contradicting them. The purpose …

  12. comment
  13. comment
    Comment #39082295

    Maybe in the 1990s. Now, try getting it running even on a network edge platform like those from Netgate. NetBSD's hardware support is singularly unstable and unusable. Most new pla…

  14. comment
    Comment #39082192

    FreeBSD can't really be said to support native-hardware PPC. Also don't forget riscv. Which it also doesn't really support in native hardware.

  15. comment
    Comment #39082174

    [flagged]

  16. comment
  17. comment
    Comment #38367684

    this logic would apply to literally every facet of human existence if it were true; your argument has devolved into "people would make more money if they were engaged in criminalit…

  18. comment
    Comment #37947153

    You are inflating the amounts considerably (and unverifiably with bald assertions) and then generalizing the rest of the industry based on anecdotal individual reports. The amount …

  19. comment
    Comment #37947019

    This is .. pretty much just a total whole-fabric lie.

  20. comment
    Comment #37806231

    The first payments in bitcoin were not the pizzas. Malmi sold bitcoins for money prior to that. The first people using Bitcoin were not ransomware users; the first bootstrappers we…

  21. comment
    Comment #37057713

    > Current libbitcoin-explorer instructions telling users to use the seed command to generate private keys. .. and receive bitcoin at them. Wow brutal.

  22. comment
    Comment #36263885

    And yet r/btc are or were all or almostly entirely paid employees of Roger Ver and Reddit didn't seem to care at all.

  23. comment
    Comment #35759694

    It is a lie, since Bitcoin Cash never moved funds that weren't signed by their owners. You're going to have to prove that, now, or admit you overspoke. The direct counter-evidence …

  24. comment
    Comment #35758759

    > I think if even 1 developer has a court order for them to push to master, it will happen whether anyone wants it to, since GitHub is already known to mindlessly abide by governme…

  25. comment
    Comment #35755437

    No, that's incorrect. There is no fundamental trust; you were describing control in a coercive sense among the developers by directly asserting that developers have specific contro…