Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — michael_storm

michael_storm

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jan 08, 2014, 8:55 PM UTC
HN karma
608
Public activity
92 items

About michael_storm

email: mstorm7 gee-mail.com

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47549408

    Some users switch apps by dragging windows around the screen, like a messy stack. A friend of mine didn't even know about Cmd+Tab to cycle through open apps. Users are weird.

  2. comment
    Comment #22829431

    Ageism isn't cool, dude.

  3. comment
    Comment #22797361

    Believe it or not, it's pretty hard to conduct a large-scale study in the middle of the largest pandemic in modern history.

  4. comment
  5. comment
    Comment #22262691

    I have. It was a few hundred bucks. There was a tax form, but I don't recall specifically what it was.

  6. comment
    Comment #19600635

    I expect more of companies and people than their minimum legal obligations.

  7. comment
    Comment #19119913

    Gotcha, no worries.

  8. comment
    Comment #19119308

    That's a false dichotomy.

  9. comment
    Comment #18945894

    I can't edit my post anymore, but I should apologize for implying that gnicholas made that argument. As others have pointed out, they were just making a point above effective rates…

  10. comment
    Comment #18942468

    I've seen this point before, but it's not an argument for keeping rates low. "If we raise rates, the rich will just find ways to avoid them!" People find new ways to try to murder …

  11. comment
    Comment #18103247

    Replying to self: I meant “unconditionally” as in without consideration of other factors — not meaning to imply that conditions should be attached to the money.

  12. comment
    Comment #18098211

    Because you’re sinking a huge amount of money into someone’s passion project, for which you may or may not have received equity before being broken up with. Being able to afford so…

  13. comment
    Comment #16683475

    Facebook itself won't be meaningfully "deleted" for at least five years. It simply has too much money: even if its main product went kaput tomorrow (which it won't), it would find …

  14. comment
    Comment #16594201

    They still have to do that to get the goods to the store. Delivering to fewer locations in bulk may be cheaper, though.

  15. comment
    Comment #16516153

    People, I think we’re missing some of the other buried gold here. Some highlights: We do a daily standup where we don't discuss why something is late. Instead we each spend 10 seco…

  16. comment
    Comment #16349291

    Fair enough. I think we’re pretty close together on that.

  17. comment
    Comment #16348697

    I’m disagreeing with that nuance. I’m saying that blind people should be able to enjoy the same things that sighted people can, rather than developers deciding for them whether or …

  18. comment
    Comment #16348612

    People with disabilities don’t need random developers determining a priori whether or not they’ll be able to use the same software as everyone else. People with disabilities aren’t…

  19. comment
    Comment #16286778

    > We will also be sending our cooks off with a transition packet, which will include their business data, customer contact info (for those who opt-in), alternative business proposa…

  20. comment
    Comment #16276100

    > but it demonstrates one reason why one can avoid doctors for seemingly non-serious ailments and conditions, particularly with all the times they've shrugged. You didn't have brea…

  21. comment
    Comment #16263340

    It being fundamentally incorrect and you not liking it are two very different things.

  22. comment
    Comment #16210505

    Why is this person downvoted? That is a true, relevant, and dispassionate statement.

  23. comment
    Comment #16059132

    Why must the CEO of Google be the most highly-paid position for Google to run well? The point is that the pay for participating in self-interested capitalist endeavors leads to out…

  24. comment
    Comment #15835326

    Or requirements to not keep data unless for a legitimate business purpose.

  25. comment
    Comment #15724834

    Then don't. GP said "seriously consider moving", not "move". Presumably the developer would do it if they value potential impact over the risk.