Viewing profile — michael_storm
michael_storm
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jan 08, 2014, 8:55 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 608
- Public activity
- 92 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About michael_storm
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47549408
Some users switch apps by dragging windows around the screen, like a messy stack. A friend of mine didn't even know about Cmd+Tab to cycle through open apps. Users are weird.
-
comment
Comment #22829431
Ageism isn't cool, dude.
-
comment
Comment #22797361
Believe it or not, it's pretty hard to conduct a large-scale study in the middle of the largest pandemic in modern history.
-
comment
Comment #22262808
Yep.
-
comment
Comment #22262691
I have. It was a few hundred bucks. There was a tax form, but I don't recall specifically what it was.
-
comment
Comment #19600635
I expect more of companies and people than their minimum legal obligations.
-
comment
Comment #19119913
Gotcha, no worries.
-
comment
Comment #19119308
That's a false dichotomy.
-
comment
Comment #18945894
I can't edit my post anymore, but I should apologize for implying that gnicholas made that argument. As others have pointed out, they were just making a point above effective rates…
-
comment
Comment #18942468
I've seen this point before, but it's not an argument for keeping rates low. "If we raise rates, the rich will just find ways to avoid them!" People find new ways to try to murder …
-
comment
Comment #18103247
Replying to self: I meant “unconditionally” as in without consideration of other factors — not meaning to imply that conditions should be attached to the money.
-
comment
Comment #18098211
Because you’re sinking a huge amount of money into someone’s passion project, for which you may or may not have received equity before being broken up with. Being able to afford so…
-
comment
Comment #16683475
Facebook itself won't be meaningfully "deleted" for at least five years. It simply has too much money: even if its main product went kaput tomorrow (which it won't), it would find …
-
comment
Comment #16594201
They still have to do that to get the goods to the store. Delivering to fewer locations in bulk may be cheaper, though.
-
comment
Comment #16516153
People, I think we’re missing some of the other buried gold here. Some highlights: We do a daily standup where we don't discuss why something is late. Instead we each spend 10 seco…
-
comment
Comment #16349291
Fair enough. I think we’re pretty close together on that.
-
comment
Comment #16348697
I’m disagreeing with that nuance. I’m saying that blind people should be able to enjoy the same things that sighted people can, rather than developers deciding for them whether or …
-
comment
Comment #16348612
People with disabilities don’t need random developers determining a priori whether or not they’ll be able to use the same software as everyone else. People with disabilities aren’t…
-
comment
Comment #16286778
> We will also be sending our cooks off with a transition packet, which will include their business data, customer contact info (for those who opt-in), alternative business proposa…
-
comment
Comment #16276100
> but it demonstrates one reason why one can avoid doctors for seemingly non-serious ailments and conditions, particularly with all the times they've shrugged. You didn't have brea…
-
comment
Comment #16263340
It being fundamentally incorrect and you not liking it are two very different things.
-
comment
Comment #16210505
Why is this person downvoted? That is a true, relevant, and dispassionate statement.
-
comment
Comment #16059132
Why must the CEO of Google be the most highly-paid position for Google to run well? The point is that the pay for participating in self-interested capitalist endeavors leads to out…
-
comment
Comment #15835326
Or requirements to not keep data unless for a legitimate business purpose.
-
comment
Comment #15724834
Then don't. GP said "seriously consider moving", not "move". Presumably the developer would do it if they value potential impact over the risk.