Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mdxn

mdxn

HN member
Joined
Fri, Aug 10, 2012, 6:31 PM UTC
HN karma
118
Public activity
56 items

About mdxn

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #27702322

    The author grew up in Michigan (although somewhat closer to southeast MI).

  2. comment
    Comment #27701945

    > "unaware that in nearby Ohio," Clearly this was written by a coastal or someone who needs a lesson in geography. Vulcan, Michigan, and for that matter most of the Upper Peninsula…

  3. comment
    Comment #23941377

    Lattice based cryptography can actually be made pretty accessible and can be taught to highschoolers and fresh undergraduates (I have done this with students at my job) as long as …

  4. comment
    Comment #23631954

    Encryption keys do not have to give "all or nothing" access to encrypted material. With homomorphic encryption and related primitives, you can shape things in a much more finer gra…

  5. comment
    Comment #23420355

    This is a misapplication of that principle and runs the risk of turning into the toxic gatekeeping that I know first hand has kept many talented people out of the academic cryptogr…

  6. comment
    Comment #23410991

    > This is not a peer-reviewed research paper. It seems to be a project report likely done by undergraduates. The paper is full of typos and it is not clear what the specific novelt…

  7. comment
    Comment #20446866

    There is definitely a difference. The problem with the vast majority of "Turing-completeness in X" claims on HN is that they are just logically complete Boolean circuits that are o…

  8. comment
    Comment #14732689

    The average GPA of millionaires alone is obviously not enough information to make the conclusions that this video is making. An average GPA of 2.9 is not far off from the average c…

  9. comment
    Comment #14616643

    I think what you are claiming here is misleading. Some pre-processing SNARK constructions (particularly ones used by some ZCash scientists) are based on multi-round interactive pro…

  10. story
  11. comment
  12. comment
  13. comment
    Comment #11859433

    Withdrawn already "The paper has been withdrawn due to a mistake in the last line of the proof--it does not hold for n=0. Thanks to Terry Tao for pointing out this crucial gap"

  14. comment
  15. comment
  16. comment
    Comment #11193743

    The hackathon that they mention in the post (Mhacks) put up an application process and enforced a 50/50 gender ratio. In the weeks leading up to the event, I overheard many defeate…

  17. comment
    Comment #10941300

    Here's a link to Zcash's first blog post on their official site: https://z.cash/blog/helloworld.html

  18. story
  19. comment
    Comment #10899311

    People reading this write-up should keep in mind that the author uses the term "complexity class" incorrectly. When the author says this, they actually mean "worst case runtime". I…

  20. comment
    Comment #10724133

    For those who are interested, Berkeley has publicly available lecture notes for their Randomness & Computation course. They go over some randomized algorithms as well as the mathem…

  21. comment
    Comment #10645651

    The actual decision problem statement for TSP is "Does there exist a tour of less than length L". It is easy to prove if such a tour exists: simply give me tour. I can sum up the l…

  22. comment
    Comment #9649833

    I heavily suspect this claim is wrong due to some amateurish mistakes. In particular, I believe the author is confusing the concepts of "checking" a solution and "searching" for on…

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #8343742

    I get the gist of what you are saying and agree with some of it. I still think the article isn't sufficient, at all, for even an elementary introduction to anything. It's incredibl…

  25. comment
    Comment #8343560

    I'll ignore discussion as to what counts as a step, what "n" is, or how it doesn't necessarily reflect on the real world. I still feel like this article focuses on the wrong thing.…