Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — lyxsus

lyxsus

HN member
Joined
Fri, Feb 01, 2013, 3:57 PM UTC
HN karma
39
Public activity
67 items

About lyxsus

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #45909303

    Why not? It may be stupid, but I'm buying it if material feels right to my skin.

  2. comment
    Comment #45185251

    Is Hamas and Iran yours?

  3. comment
    Comment #45183524

    UNRWA is compromised as hell, ofc it must go, so it's a pretty good use case for ethical ads usage. Definitely not a reason to enforce an additional censorship.

  4. comment
    Comment #40859281

    Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: Depends Technologies: JavaScript/TypeScript, NodeJS, React, Graphl, Relay, Apollo, Nextjs, Python, Postgres, Mong…

  5. comment
    Comment #39432042

    This is incredible. I really want it to take off.

  6. comment
    Comment #34339901

    omg. ok, adopting some F features is an interesting idea. but why are they trying to make that thing with syntax happen?

  7. comment
    Comment #34337907

    tbh, tailwind feels like the worst thing that happened to frontend dev since coffee script.

  8. comment
    Comment #32418720

    > semantic web forcing everything into a single schema I don't think "forcing" is the right word here, I think the right one would be "expects it to converge under practical incent…

  9. comment
    Comment #32417092

    Oh, I would like to see a look on your face when just in about 100-200 years from now it will be mature enough for a "web scale".

  10. comment
    Comment #32416897

    Understood, thank you. Yes, that's not solvable with just OWL (though it might help a little) or any other popular reasoners I know. There're papers, proposals and experimental imp…

  11. comment
    Comment #32416701

    so if it tries to have a unified ontology that's why it's destined to fail, but if it's designed to working with many small ontologies… that's why it will fail! lol, but you can't …

  12. comment
    Comment #32416562

    That's a valid point, but I'm not sure, the following problem has a technical solution: > Clear indicators the owl author didn't know the domain

  13. comment
    Comment #32416301

    There're a lot of wrong perspectives on the topic in this thread, but this one I like the most. When someone starts to talk about "agreeing on a single schema/ontology" it's a soli…

  14. comment
    Comment #32327350

    Isn’t it similar to linear types in haskell?

  15. comment
    Comment #31776812

    We’re not, but your point is still valid.

  16. comment
    Comment #27061721

    If you open specification linked to that page ( https://wicg.github.io/sanitizer-api/#sanitizer-api ), you'll see that Sanitizer constructor accepts config param, that does exactly…

  17. comment
    Comment #27057919

    Location: Saint-Petersburg, Russia Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: Yes Technologies: Javascript/TypeScript, React (Relay/Redux/Apollo), Postgresql/Mysql/NoSQLs, K8S, Python Résumé…

  18. comment
    Comment #25529461

    As a non-US citizen, I have 3 questions: 1. WTF 2. Is it even enforceable? 3. Does anybody know recent examples?

  19. comment
    Comment #25425112

    > However, there now exist a number of contexts in which namespace prefixes can impart information value in an XML document. Well, yeah. They've given up to a mass amount of half-a…

  20. comment
    Comment #25425071

    I would say use XML Schema at least. DTD looks alien to XML anyway.

  21. comment
    Comment #25424862

    It doesn't affect data model encoded in document even a tiny bit. Namespace prefixes are irrelevant. If changing these prefixes breaks the program, the program is incorrect.

  22. comment
    Comment #25423661

    Well, yeah, true. I believe it's mostly implementation and popularisation problems. The w3c specs surrounding xml/xpath/xslt/rdf and etc are very well designed but it's possible to…

  23. comment
    Comment #25422856

    > That doesn't seem accurate at all. It would be the case if there was some deterministic abbreviation from URL namespace qualifiers down to namespace prefixes, but there is not; I…

  24. comment
    Comment #25422647

    What do you suggest to use instead? It's a bit too early to use RDF, people haven't catch up yet.

  25. comment
    Comment #25422612

    > This breaks people's mental models of how XML works, and correspondingly, breaks people's code that manipulates XML. Because they usually have incorrect mental model. Blaming nam…