Viewing profile — lyxsus
lyxsus
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Feb 01, 2013, 3:57 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 39
- Public activity
- 67 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About lyxsus
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45909303
Why not? It may be stupid, but I'm buying it if material feels right to my skin.
-
comment
Comment #45185251
Is Hamas and Iran yours?
-
comment
Comment #45183524
UNRWA is compromised as hell, ofc it must go, so it's a pretty good use case for ethical ads usage. Definitely not a reason to enforce an additional censorship.
-
comment
Comment #40859281
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: Depends Technologies: JavaScript/TypeScript, NodeJS, React, Graphl, Relay, Apollo, Nextjs, Python, Postgres, Mong…
-
comment
Comment #39432042
This is incredible. I really want it to take off.
-
comment
Comment #34339901
omg. ok, adopting some F features is an interesting idea. but why are they trying to make that thing with syntax happen?
-
comment
Comment #34337907
tbh, tailwind feels like the worst thing that happened to frontend dev since coffee script.
-
comment
Comment #32418720
> semantic web forcing everything into a single schema I don't think "forcing" is the right word here, I think the right one would be "expects it to converge under practical incent…
-
comment
Comment #32417092
Oh, I would like to see a look on your face when just in about 100-200 years from now it will be mature enough for a "web scale".
-
comment
Comment #32416897
Understood, thank you. Yes, that's not solvable with just OWL (though it might help a little) or any other popular reasoners I know. There're papers, proposals and experimental imp…
-
comment
Comment #32416701
so if it tries to have a unified ontology that's why it's destined to fail, but if it's designed to working with many small ontologies… that's why it will fail! lol, but you can't …
-
comment
Comment #32416562
That's a valid point, but I'm not sure, the following problem has a technical solution: > Clear indicators the owl author didn't know the domain
-
comment
Comment #32416301
There're a lot of wrong perspectives on the topic in this thread, but this one I like the most. When someone starts to talk about "agreeing on a single schema/ontology" it's a soli…
-
comment
Comment #32327350
Isn’t it similar to linear types in haskell?
-
comment
Comment #31776812
We’re not, but your point is still valid.
-
comment
Comment #27061721
If you open specification linked to that page ( https://wicg.github.io/sanitizer-api/#sanitizer-api ), you'll see that Sanitizer constructor accepts config param, that does exactly…
-
comment
Comment #27057919
Location: Saint-Petersburg, Russia Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: Yes Technologies: Javascript/TypeScript, React (Relay/Redux/Apollo), Postgresql/Mysql/NoSQLs, K8S, Python Résumé…
-
comment
Comment #25529461
As a non-US citizen, I have 3 questions: 1. WTF 2. Is it even enforceable? 3. Does anybody know recent examples?
-
comment
Comment #25425112
> However, there now exist a number of contexts in which namespace prefixes can impart information value in an XML document. Well, yeah. They've given up to a mass amount of half-a…
-
comment
Comment #25425071
I would say use XML Schema at least. DTD looks alien to XML anyway.
-
comment
Comment #25424862
It doesn't affect data model encoded in document even a tiny bit. Namespace prefixes are irrelevant. If changing these prefixes breaks the program, the program is incorrect.
-
comment
Comment #25423661
Well, yeah, true. I believe it's mostly implementation and popularisation problems. The w3c specs surrounding xml/xpath/xslt/rdf and etc are very well designed but it's possible to…
-
comment
Comment #25422856
> That doesn't seem accurate at all. It would be the case if there was some deterministic abbreviation from URL namespace qualifiers down to namespace prefixes, but there is not; I…
-
comment
Comment #25422647
What do you suggest to use instead? It's a bit too early to use RDF, people haven't catch up yet.
-
comment
Comment #25422612
> This breaks people's mental models of how XML works, and correspondingly, breaks people's code that manipulates XML. Because they usually have incorrect mental model. Blaming nam…