Viewing profile — le0n
le0n
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Oct 26, 2014, 3:54 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 33
- Public activity
- 16 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About le0n
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #14551167
Haskell/GHC will soon have an extension for linear types, which will bring the languages much closer: http://blog.tweag.io/posts/2017-03-13-linear-types.html
-
comment
Comment #13595968
A confidence interval won't adjust the points (point estimates) but will give those points with a lower sample size wide confidence intervals (often covering zero). Using an (empir…
-
comment
Comment #11632220
I wonder whether this is the same sense in which the brain also uses logic to reason about stuff, and physics to interact with the world.
-
comment
Comment #11538112
It seems to me more bent on buttressing a pro-scientific religious viewpoint.
-
comment
Comment #11427471
Panama papers -- OpenBazaar -- cool!
-
comment
Comment #11063498
Just so people know, there is a competing/complementary approach to causality in statistics, called the potential outcomes or (Neyman-)Rubin causal model, which as I understand it …
-
comment
Comment #10330128
I don't think machine learning vs Bayes vs sampling theory has much to do with the content of the article, which is more about causality than interpretations of probability. > it's…
-
comment
Comment #10329565
Possibly related simultaneous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10328699
-
comment
Comment #10329385
+1. A fantastic article. Definitely one of the best popular-level stats pieces I've read.
-
comment
Comment #9973225
Is anyone really an AGI expert?
-
comment
Comment #9782319
“Seeing the world through the lens of Bayes’ Theorem is like seeing The Matrix. Nothing is the same after you have seen Bayes.” I'm pretty sure this is an instance of cognitive bia…
-
comment
Comment #9761806
A great article on similar issues is "Turing Test: 50 Years Later": http://crl.ucsd.edu/~saygin/papers/MMTT.pdf It touches on the "physics is computable therefore the mind is compu…
-
comment
Comment #9704322
I prefer comprehensions over either mapping or explicit recursion. Mapping is a win for abstraction but a loss for clarity.
-
comment
Comment #9574359
I cried.
-
comment
Comment #8519686
Also a review at NDPR, which makes some points similar to mine above: http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/53333-philosophy-between-the-lines-t...
-
comment
Comment #8510197
There are some distinct ideas that this article at times seems to conflate: - Obscurity, speaking in fables, non-clarity, indirectness. Multiple layers to one's teaching. This poss…